Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:02]

CALL TO ORDER THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

[CALL TO ORDER]

CITY OF PRINCETON REGULAR MEETING MAY 15TH, 2023.

COMMISSIONER.

PLEASE SILENCE ALL CELL PHONES AND STAND AND JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS.

ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

PUBLIC APPEARANCE SPEAKERS ARE ALLOWED THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS UNABLE TO RESPOND OR TO DISCUSS ANY ISSUES THAT ARE BROUGHT UP DURING THIS SECTION THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA OTHER THAN TO MAKE STATEMENTS OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO A SPEAKER'S INQUIRY OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO ANY INQUIRY.

AND I'LL NOTE WE HAVE THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS TONIGHT.

SO IF YOU ARE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THOSE THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS, PLEASE WAIT UNTIL THOSE PUBLIC HEARINGS ARE OPEN.

THIS WOULD JUST BE OTHER.

PUBLIC APPEARANCES.

ANYONE. WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

ALL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS LISTED ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION.

THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS A COMMISSIONER SO REQUESTS IN WHICH EVENT THE ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED IN ITS NORMAL SEQUENCE ON THE AGENDA.

THE ONLY ITEM IN THE CONSENT AGENDA IS THE MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING.

IF THERE'S NO OBJECTION, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.

I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.

I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR. SAY AYE.

AYE. MOTION CARRIES 4-0.

MOVE ON TO THE REGULAR AGENDA.

[REGULAR AGENDA]

ITEM NUMBER ONE, PUBLIC HEARING ZA2022-0264 ZONE MAP AMENDMENT DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING A REQUEST FROM HAZELWOOD VILLAS LLC FOR A ZONE MAP AMENDMENT FOR A PROPERTY BEING 38.03 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE HART AND WRIGHT SURVEY.

ABSTRACT NUMBER 957 CITY OF PRINCETON COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS.

GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION CRAIG FISHER, PLANNING MANAGER WITH THE CITY.

THIS REQUEST IS TO TO MAKE AN AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PD 14A.

THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL PD WITH MULTIFAMILY AND TOWNHOME OR DUPLEX AND SINGLE FAMILY USES.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO MODIFY A COUPLE OF THE STIPULATIONS IN THE DISTRICT TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS. I'LL GET THOSE VARIANCE REQUESTS ON THE ON THE SCREEN HERE.

SO THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS WITHIN THE THE DUPLEX ZONING DISTRICT.

THEY'RE REQUESTING TO REDUCE THOSE FROM 8FT TO 5FT.

AND THEN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK ALONG THE STREET SIDE WOULD BE REDUCED TO FIVE FEET FROM 15FT.

AND ALSO MINIMUM LOT AREA SHALL BE 7000FT².

STAFF LOOKED AT OTHER SIMILAR DUPLEX ZONING DISTRICTS AND FOUND THAT THIS WAS FAIRLY CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE'VE APPROVED RECENTLY IN OTHER DEVELOPMENTS.

SO STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS AMENDMENT TO PD 14A.

BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE TO SPEAK.

OKAY. I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:05.

IF THERE'S ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, INCLUDING THE DEVELOPER.

GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBER.

THIS IS ABDUL MOHAMMED I'M REPRESENTING HERE FROM THE HAZELWOOD WILLOWS.

I'M HERE TO REQUEST FOR THE SETBACKS TO BE ADJUSTED FROM 8FT TO 5FT.

THE REASON FOR THAT, WE TRY TO KIND OF PUT A PRODUCT OUT THERE WHICH IS NOT WORKING OUT BASED ON 27FT OF EACH SIDE OF THE DUPLEX, BASED ON A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS WITH THE DIFFERENT BUILDERS AROUND HERE.

THEY ARE RECOMMENDING TO GO WITH THE 30 FOOT, WHICH IS WHAT KIND OF INCONSISTENT WITH A LOT OF OTHER PRODUCTS THAT ARE BEING MARKETED OUT HERE IN PRINCETON.

[00:05:04]

AND I HAVE SOME MODEL HOMES THAT WE'RE TRYING TO PRODUCE HERE.

AND THEN WITH YOUR PERMISSION, I WOULD LIKE TO HAND THIS OVER.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ON THE FIRST PAGE, YOU WILL SEE ONE OF THE MODEL DUPLEX THAT WE HAVE.

AND ON THE SECOND PAGE AND THIRD PAGE, THERE ARE TWO OTHER MODELS AND THEN THE PAGE.

THE OTHER TWO PAGES HAVE THE LAYOUT FOR THE FIRST FLOOR AND THE SECOND FLOOR.

A LOT OF THE REQUESTS THAT WE SEE OUT HERE IS WE NEED TO HAVE A MASTER BEDROOM DOWNSTAIRS TO MAKE THE PRODUCT VIABLE FOR EVERYBODY TO MOVE IN.

AND HAVING THE 27 FOOT IS KIND OF PREVENTING US TO ACCOMMODATE THE MASTER BEDROOM DOWNSTAIRS.

SO SO THIS THE THE REDUCTION OF THE SIDE SETBACK FROM EIGHT FEET TO FIVE AND THE REDUCTION OF THE STREET SIDE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 15 TO 5.

THAT'S ON THE DUPLEXES.

THAT'S FOR THE DUPLEXES.

YEAH. THE WHOLE ALL OF THESE CHANGES ARE JUST FOR THE DUPLEXES, WHICH IS ABOUT 19 ACRES OUT OF THOSE 38.

OKAY.

MR. SUTTON. HERE YOU CAN SEE ON MY SCREEN THE THE 38 ACRES.

AND IT'S IN THE MIDDLE, THERE'S A SECTION, A TRACT THAT'S DESIGNATED FOR DUPLEXES.

SO IT WON'T APPLY TO THE SINGLE FAMILY PORTION THAT'S FURTHER SOUTH.

SO THIS IS DIVIDED INTO THREE SECTIONS.

THIS IS DIVIDED INTO YES, THE TOP PORTION IS A MULTIFAMILY AND THEN THE MIDDLE PORTION IS A DUPLEXES.

THEN THE BOTTOM IS A SINGLE FAMILY.

GOTCHA. SO THE MULTIFAMILY AND A SINGLE FAMILY STAYING THE SAME AS IS JUST AS THE DUPLEXES IS WHAT WE'RE REQUESTING FOR CHANGE.

I'M NOT AS CONCERNED WITH THE REDUCTION FROM 8 TO 5 ON THE SIDE SETBACKS AS I AM FROM THE WITH THE 15 TO 5. SO THE FIVE YARD STREET SIDE YARD SETBACK AT FIVE FEET.

SO THEN YOU HAVE THE EASEMENT BEYOND THAT.

CORRECT. SIDEWALK EASEMENT.

BRICK. I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT LIKE, WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT, DISTANCE FROM STREET TO BRICK.

YEAH. SO BROCK CORBETT WITH KIMLEY-HORN 260, EAST DAVIS STREET AND [INAUDIBLE] WERE THE CIVIL ENGINEER ON THE PROJECT.

SO YEAH, YOU'RE LOOKING AT FROM THE STREET, I THINK THE GENERAL SECTION, THERE'S ABOUT EIGHT, 7 TO 8FT BETWEEN THE STREET AND YOUR EDGE OF YOUR RIGHT OF WAY.

AND THEN YES, IT WOULD BE ANOTHER FIVE FEET INTERIOR TO THAT.

SO YOU WOULD HAVE YOUR SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PARKWAY AND YOU WOULD HAVE FIVE FEET UNTIL YEAH, THE SIDE OF THAT BRICK WOULD BE 1213 FROM? YEAH, FROM THE EDGE OF STREET SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN.

YEAH. 15-10 TO 12.

WELL, PROBABLY 12 TO 15FT.

YES SIR.

BY CHANCE, DO YOU KNOW? I GUESS I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW.

HOW MANY OF THESE DUPLEXES ARE GOING TO BE IN THAT SITUATION TO WHERE THEY HAVE A STREET SIDE SIDE SETBACK OF FIVE FEET? I MEAN, I CAN SEE IT'S A SMALL STRIP AND IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A VERY BIG PART OF THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT AS A WHOLE, RIGHT? YEAH. SO IT'S REALLY THE ONLY ONES THAT ARE GOING TO HAVE A STREET ON THE SIDE OF THAT, WHICH JUST LOOKING AT THE LAYOUT.

IT'S GOING TO BE ABOUT TEN OF THE.

[00:10:01]

DO YOU REMEMBER HOW MANY TOTAL THERE ARE? YEAH, I THINK IT'S 8 OR 10 OUT OF THE OVERALL 160 ISH UNITS TOTAL.

OKAY.

MR. BELLON. I GUESS THIS QUESTION MIGHT BE MORE FOR CRAIG DIRECTLY. DO WE HAVE A DEFINITIVE ON HOW MANY FEET THAT RIGHT OF WAY OR EASEMENT IS SO THAT I COULD SAY, YEAH, IT'S FIVE BETWEEN BRICK AND THEN RIGHT OF WAY BEGINS AND THEN THAT IS A DEFINITIVE 10FT OR 12FT.

I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE DON'T FALL OUT OF WINDOWS AND JUST LIKE INTO A ROAD SITUATION.

AND I SAY IT HALFWAY JOKINGLY, BUT YEAH, IT SEEMS REALLY CLOSE.

IF THE EASEMENT IS TRULY 10 OR 12FT, THEN THAT WOULDN'T HAPPEN.

YEAH, THAT WOULD BE MY DECIDING FACTOR.

I'M GOING TO PULL UP THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SO WE CAN HAVE A VISUAL TO LOOK AT.

JUST A MOMENT.

YEAH, THAT WOULD BE GREAT.

RIGHT THERE. RIGHT THERE. YEAH, YEAH.

SO BETWEEN YOUR ACTUAL EDGE OF BUILDING AND WHERE THAT ROADWAY WOULD BE YOUR BACK OF CURB, YOU WOULD HAVE PROBABLY ABOUT 12FT ON IT.

AND, CRAIG, I DON'T KNOW IF THE IF YOU HAVE THE SECTION FOR THE ROADWAY ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS.

THERE YOU GO. IF YOU CAN ZOOM IN THERE.

SO THESE ARE THE LOTS THAT WILL BE AFFECTED ALONG HERE.

CORRECT? YEAH. AND THEN THE CORNER LOTS ON THE ON THE NORTHERN ROW.

SO THIS IS WHAT'S CURRENTLY APPROVED.

YOU CAN SEE THAT THE PAD OR THE BUILDING WOULD BE LOCATED AND THEN THE PROPERTY LINE IS HERE.

AND THEN THERE'S THE CURB.

SO THAT DOTTED LINE ON THE LEFT SIDE WOULD BE PULLED IN TEN MORE FEET.

CORRECT? YEAH. THERE'S 15FT SHOWN HERE AND THIS WOULD BE REDUCED TO FIVE FEET.

IS THAT CORRECT, BROCK? THAT? YES, CORRECT.

FOR THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS, YES.

AND IF I MAY ADD, THAT PARTICULAR LOT ON THE CORNER, THAT STREET ACTUALLY LEADS INTO THE MULTIFAMILY UNIT.

AND WE WILL WE HAVE A PROPOSAL TO PUT AN IRON GATE ON THERE SO THERE WON'T BE ANY THROUGH TRAFFIC GOING BACK AND FORTH.

SO THESE CHANGES IN THE SETBACK LINES ARE TO MAKE THE DUPLEXES FROM GOING FROM A 27 FOOT WIDTH TO A 30 FOOT WIDTH.

AND YOU'RE GAINING THREE FEET ON THREE FEET IN THE MIDDLE.

RIGHT. AND THAT SETBACK.

SO THAT WOULD ALLOW US TO HAVE A GOOD SIZE OF GARAGE AND THEN HAVE A PASSAGE TO GO INSIDE THE UNIT.

NOT HAVING TO KIND OF CROSS OVER, I CAN ADJUST THAT.

THREE FEET IS MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE FOR US.

IT DOESN'T FEEL LIKE YOU'RE WALKING INTO A TINY ALLEY.

FEEL BETTER ABOUT THAT.

LAST QUESTION.

WHAT WAS THE STANDARD FOR MINIMUM LOT AREA? IF WE'RE MOVING IT TO 7000.

IF YOU HAVE THAT, GO AHEAD.

I'LL NEED TO LOOK IT UP. I BELIEVE IT'S 80 200FT OR 8400.

[00:15:05]

BUT THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR THE WIDTH AND THE DEPTH OF THE LOT IN THE BASE ZONING ARE 70 BY 100FT.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE BASED A LOT WIDTH AND DEPTH ON SO THAT THE 70 BY 100 IS NOT CHANGING.

SO YOU STILL HAVE THE 70 BY 100 FOR THE REQUIRED ORDINANCE.

YEAH. CORRECT. THAT AND THAT IS.

YEAH. LOT AREA IS NOT CHANGING FROM THE ORIGINAL APPROVED PLANS.

THAT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT MORE OR LESS SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS ON THE REVIEW FOR THE PLANS THAT IT'S BEING ADDRESSED CURRENTLY WITH THIS AMENDMENT.

OKAY. OKAY.

SO APPROVAL OF THIS ONE WOULD NOT WE WOULD OMIT THE MINIMUM LOT AREA SHALL BE 7000FT² SO THAT ONE WOULDN'T APPLY.

NO IT IS NEEDED.

SO THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FOR A DUPLEX LOT IS 70FT.

THE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH IS 100FT, BUT THE MINIMUM LOT AREA IS LARGER THAN 7000FT² IN THE BASE DUPLEX DISTRICT. OKAY. SO IT IS NEEDED FOR TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE DEVELOPERS? I DON'T KNOW. OKAY.

THANK YOU, GUYS.

THANK YOU. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 617.

AND IF THERE ARE NO MORE QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THIS ITEM.

MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE VA0220264 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT.

I'LL SECOND THAT. HAVE A MOTION A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. MOTION CARRIES 4-0.

NEXT ITEM. PUBLIC HEARING ZA 20230861.

ZONING MAP AMENDMENT.

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING A REQUEST FROM CHARLES W SMITH AND SONS FUNERAL HOME FOR A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR A PROPERTY BEING A 0.252 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE HEART AND RIGHT SURVEY.

ABSTRACT NUMBER 957.

CITY OF PRINCETON COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS.

IS THIS REQUEST IS TO REZONE A 0.252 ACRE TRACT FROM SF-1 TO SEE TOO MUCH OF THE SURROUNDING LAND IS ZONED C TWO.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS TO ACCOMMODATE FOR A REDEVELOPMENT OF THE EXISTING FUNERAL HOME.

THEY'RE LOOKING TO BUILD A NEW FACILITY AND EXPAND A LARGER FACILITY THAN WHAT'S THERE CURRENTLY.

SO IT'S THE FUNERAL HOME.

EXISTING FUNERAL HOME IS HERE AND THEY'RE LOOKING TO EXPAND ONTO THE TWO LOTS TO THE NORTH.

BUT THE NORTHERNMOST LOT IS CURRENTLY ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL.

SO IN ORDER TO EXPAND, THEY NEED TO REZONE.

STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS REQUEST AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED.

BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE.

OKAY. I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 619.

IF THERE'S ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT.

BRICK. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF TURN YOUR.

TURN THAT MIC ON.

THERE YOU GO. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. MY NAME IS LAWRENCE RINGLEY.

I'M WITH RINGLEY ASSOCIATES, LOCATED AT 701 SOUTH TENNESSEE STREET.

MCKINNEY. I'M HERE REPRESENTING MY CLIENT, CHARLES W SMITH AND SONS FUNERAL HOME.

WE'RE ASKING TO REZONE THE NORTHERN LOT THAT HE OWNS, WHICH IS A LOT FOR THE CALDWELL ADDITION, LOCATED AT 109 CALDWELL STREET.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS REZONING IS SO THAT THE REDEVELOPMENT AND REBUILDING OF THE FUNERAL HOME CAN BE DONE.

AND THEN THIS LOT THAT WE'RE ASKING TO AMEND THE ZONING ON CAN BE USED AS A PARKING LOT.

[00:20:05]

AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE ABOUT IT.

OKAY. AND THE OWNER IS HERE AS WELL.

OKAY. NO.

MAKES PRETTY GOOD SENSE TO ME.

ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH.

ONLY QUESTION THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO THE NORTH OF THAT IS THAT HOME INHABITED CURRENTLY.

AND I BELIEVE IT IS A RENTAL.

OKAY. BUT WE HAVE NOT COMPLETED OUR SITE PLANNING YET.

WE'RE JUST GETTING THE START BECAUSE OVER THE YEARS THE CURRENT FUNERAL HOME IS LOCATED ON THAT SOUTHERN LOT, WHICH IS LOT SIX AND THE EXPANSION OF HIGHWAY 380, WHICH NOW PRINCETON BOULEVARD, IS REALLY SUCKED UP THE FRONT OF THAT PROPERTY IN FRONT OF THE FUNERAL HOME.

AND THE FUNERAL HOME, AS YOU WELL KNOW, IT USED TO BE A CHURCH AND IT'S A LITTLE OUTDATED BUT COMPARED TO THE OTHER FUNERAL HOMES MR. SMITH HAS [INAUDIBLE]. SO WE'RE JUST ASKING TO BE ABLE TO REBUILD THIS SECTION AND THEN CROSS THAT ALLEY, WHICH IS ALSO ZONED COMMERCIAL TWO.

WE'LL HAVE A PARKING LOT OVER THERE AND I'M SURE WE'LL HAVE TO ABIDE BY ALL THE SCREENING AND SO FORTH WITH OUR SITE PLAN.

OKAY. YEAH.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

SO REGARDING THAT ZONING CRAIG, I THINK THAT WOULD BE A 6 FOOT OR 6 FOOT MASONRY WALL ALONG THE PARKING LOT BETWEEN THE HOUSE? CORRECT. YES. WHERE THE COMMERCIAL ABUTS TO THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING.

THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO SCREEN.

THANK YOU. SEE A MINIMUM SIX FOOT MAXIMUM EIGHT FOOT HIGH MASONRY WALL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE TWO.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:23 AND I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THIS ITEM.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ZA 20230861 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT.

I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. MOTION CARRIES 4-0.

THANK YOU, GUYS. NEXT ITEM.

PUBLIC HEARING SUP 20230942.

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF PRINCETON FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A COMMERCIAL ANTENNA FOR VARIOUS SITES THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF PRINCETON COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS TO HELP THE CITY WITH REACH OUR GOALS OF OUR COMMUNICATION PLAN. THIS THIS CAME ABOUT FOR A NEED FOR A TOWER HERE AT THE MUNICIPAL CENTER FOR OUR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER.

AND WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO TO TO WORK TOGETHER WITH A COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY TO CONSTRUCT THAT TOWER TO THEN CO-LOCATE CELLULAR ANTENNAS ON THE TOWERS.

THE TOWERS THEMSELVES WILL ALL BE ON CITY PROPERTY.

SO THERE'S SEVEN SITES THAT THIS WOULD APPLY TO.

I'LL GO THROUGH THOSE ON THE SCREEN, THE FIRST OF WHICH IS EASTRIDGE BOOSTER STATION SITE.

THIS IS A CITY OWNED PROPERTY AT FM 1827 AND FM 75.

THE SECOND LOCATION IS HERE, THE MUNICIPAL CENTER.

AND THEN THE THIRD LOCATION IS THE DALE LAMBERT PARK SITE, EAST OF TOWN, JUST EAST OF THE PRINCETON LAKES DEVELOPMENT AT A CITY OWNED A FUTURE PARK LAND SITE.

SITE NUMBER FOUR IS THE OLD FOREST GROVE PUMP STATION SITE AT FOREST GROVE AND WEST PRINCETON DRIVE.

SITE NUMBER FIVE IS A PARCEL OF LAND THAT THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PURCHASED ALONG COUNTY ROAD 1219. IT'S JUST SOUTH OF THE S CURVE ON FM 982.

LOCATION NUMBER SIX IS JJ BUCK WILSON PARK, WHICH IS A NEW PARK UNDER CONSTRUCTION ALONG SOUTH BEECHAM BOULEVARD.

[00:25:04]

AND FINALLY, LOCATION SEVEN IS FIRE STATION NUMBER TWO AT NORTH BEECHAM AND MONTE CARLO BOULEVARD.

SO REZONING OR THE APPROVAL OF THESE SUPS WILL ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL ANTENNAS AT ALL SEVEN SITES.

THESE TOWERS WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 120FT TALL.

THEY'LL ALL BE OF STEALTH DESIGN.

I HAVE SOME IMAGERY TO SHOW YOU.

FIRST OF THE TOWER THAT'S PROPOSED FOR CITY HALL.

IT WOULD BE LOCATED IN THIS PARKING LOT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE MUNICIPAL CENTER SITE.

AND HERE ARE SOME BEFORE AND AFTER IMAGERY OF WHAT'S PROPOSED.

IT'S A MONOLITHIC TOWER.

THE ANTENNA WOULD ALL BE CONCEALED WITHIN THAT TOWER.

I'VE JUST GOT A COUPLE OF SHOTS AROUND THE MUNICIPAL CENTER TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT THAT WILL LOOK LIKE.

THERE'S BEFORE AND AFTER JUST POKING UP ABOVE THE BUILDING.

THIS IS FROM THE NORTH, ACROSS THE STREET ALONG PRINCETON CROSSROADS.

YOU CAN SEE THE TOWER THERE.

WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE.

AND THEN THIS IS OVER FROM THE HIGH SCHOOL.

THIS IS THE CURRENT CONDITION.

AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE TOWER HERE.

IT'S, NOT ALL OF THE TOWERS WILL HAVE THIS DESIGN, BUT THEY ALL WILL BE OF STEALTH.

SO HAVE SOME.

POTENTIAL IDEAS FOR WHAT THOSE TOWERS COULD LOOK LIKE.

IT COULD BE DISGUISED AS CLOCK TOWERS OR WATER TOWERS OR EVEN TO RESEMBLE TREES.

SO THESE TOWERS WILL ASSIST THE CITY IN IMPLEMENTING OUR GOALS AGAIN, IN OUR COMMUNICATION MASTER PLAN, ALLOW FOR EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS AS WELL AS CELLULAR COMPANIES WILL BE ABLE TO CO-LOCATE ON THESE TOWERS TO ENHANCE CELL COVERAGE HERE IN TOWN.

SO STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST, AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL MAY HAVE.

OKAY. I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:28.

IF THERE'S ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

AND I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:28.

ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION? NO. I'LL BITE.

SO I KNOW THAT WE DON'T HAVE THE INFO READILY.

WELL, FIRST, LET ME ASK, ARE THE TWO GENTLEMEN.

IN THE CROWDED AUDIENCE HERE FOR THIS TOPIC OR SOMETHING ELSE.

OKAY. I WOULD LIKE TO NOTE SAY FOR.

FOR THE FUTURE OF THIS PROJECT IF APPROVED.

THE FREQUENCIES THAT WILL BE RECEIVED OR TRANSMITTED.

IT MIGHT BE OF SIGNIFICANCE OR IMPORTANCE FOR AN AMATEUR RADIO OPERATOR OR A FCC LICENSED RADIO OPERATOR.

SO THEY MIGHT FIND THIS AS A BENEFIT.

DEPENDING ON THE FREQUENCY SUPPORTED.

SO THAT'S THAT'S MY ONLY PIECE.

I CAN I CAN LOOK INTO THAT AND GET BACK TO YOU.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THIS ITEM.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE SUP 20230942.

I'LL SECOND. HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR. SAY AYE.

AYE. MOTION CARRIES 4-0.

NEXT ITEM. PL 20230969.

PRELIMINARY PLAT PRINCETON 28 ADDITION DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING A REQUEST FROM RIATA DEVELOPMENT FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A PROPERTY BEING A 1.61 ACRE TRACT IN THE DAVID SHERRY SURVEY.

ABSTRACT NUMBER 166 COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS.

THERE'S A TYPO IN THE AGENDA.

THE I FIGURED THAT IT'S A 28.85 ACRE TRACT OF LAND.

THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MONTE CARLO BOULEVARD, JUST NORTH OF WHERE SIXTH STREET INTERSECTS.

THIS PROPERTY IS JUST OUTSIDE OF CITY LIMITS, SO IT IS IN THE CITY'S ETJ OR EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

[00:30:05]

CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THEIR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS AND HAS FOUND IT TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S REGULATIONS.

THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED.

I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THE APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL.

OKAY. SO WOULD THIS BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY LIMITS OR IS IT? I DO NOT BELIEVE THEY INTEND TO ANNEX, NOR IS IT REQUIRED THAT IT BE VOLUNTARY.

IF THEY WISH TO DO SO, THEY COULD.

THEY ARE CONTIGUOUS WITH CITY LIMITS, SO THEY ARE ELIGIBLE TO ANNEX ANYTHING YOU GUYS WOULD LIKE TO SAY.

NO. ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, IT DOESN'T REALLY SPECIFY THE TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THIS IS AND THE NUMBER OF HOUSES OR DWELLINGS.

I DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION.

COULD YOU ADDRESS THAT, PLEASE? AT THIS STAGE, COULD YOU COME TO THE MIC? TURN ON THE MIC, PLEASE.

THANK YOU. A PRISONER.

CAMPBELL. SORRY.

IT'LL TURN GREEN. THERE IT IS.

YEAH. AT THIS STAGE, IT'S A BILL FOR RENT COMMUNITY BEING PLANNED, AND IT'S A LITTLE OVER 180 UNITS.

WHAT WAS YOUR FIRST BILL? A BILL FOR RENT COMMUNITY 108 UNITS.

100 AND 181 UNITS.

AND THIS IS LIKE TOWNHOMES OR SO THERE WILL BE SINGLE STORY MANUFACTURED HOMES AT THIS STAGE.

SO STORY MANUFACTURED? YES. DIVINE MANUFACTURED HOME.

SO THEY WILL BE MADE.

SO WE'LL BUILD OUT AN AMENITY, A PROGRAM, AMENITY SET ON SITE, AND THE HOMES WILL ACTUALLY BE MADE OFF SITE.

OKAY. SO THESE ARE THE TYPE THAT ARE THAT ARE STILL PUT ON A FOUNDATION AND IT WILL BE PURE AND BEAM.

YES. FOUNDATION.

SO THEY'LL BE TIED IN BY SEPARATE COMPANIES AND THEY'RE MORE OF A LIKE A HARDY PLANK OUT EXTERIOR VINYL SIDING, SMART PANEL FROM CEILING TO GROUND.

SO THEY'LL BE SIDED WITH SMART PANEL.

YES, MA'AM. HOW MANY SQUARE FEET ARE THESE STRUCTURES ON AVERAGE? I'M ENVISIONING A TRADITIONAL MANUFACTURED HOME.

YES. LIKE A DOUBLE WIDE.

SO ON AVERAGE, THERE ARE 1083 83FT² WITH A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF THEM BEING THREE BEDROOMS. OKAY. WE'LL HAVE A PERCENTAGE OF SINGLE STORY ONES AND TWOS, BUT A LARGER PERCENTAGE OF THEM WILL BE THREE BEDROOM HOMES.

OKAY. STAND ALONE.

EACH OF THEM WILL HAVE THEIR OWN PRIVATE FENCE.

OBVIOUSLY, NO SHARED WALLS.

THEY'LL EACH HAVE TWO DEDICATED SPACES FOR PARKING.

AND WE'LL BUILD OUT AMENITIES THAT ARE STICK BUILT ON SITE AS WELL.

THAT'S WHERE YOU SEE KIND OF THAT THIRD, THIRD AREA TO BE PLOTTED.

SO WE'VE GOT A LIFT STATION.

THE COMMUNITY ITSELF AND THEN THE AMENITY CLUBHOUSE AREA THAT WILL BE STICK BUILT ON SITE WILL INHABITANTS.

IS THIS A LONG TERM OR IS IT SOMETHING WHERE THEY'RE RENTING MONTH TO MONTH, JUST THE LOT AND THEN MAYBE MOVING? COULD THEY PUT THEIR MOTOR HOME THERE? SO FROM A MAINTENANCE STANDPOINT, WE WANT TO OWN ALL OF THE STRUCTURES THEMSELVES.

SO WE WILL OWN AND OPERATE THE COMMUNITY WITH A THIRD PARTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY.

INTERESTING. OKAY.

AND THAT'S TO CONTROL THE QUALITY.

WE DON'T WANT TO JUST OWN THE LAND.

WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO CONTROL THE QUALITY OF THE HOME AS WELL.

SO YOU PUT EVERYTHING IN AND NOTHING GOES IN AND OUT.

YES, SIR. EXACTLY.

SO THEY'RE ALL BRAND NEW HOMES.

WHO'S THE MANUFACTURER OF THE HOME? IF YOU DON'T MIND ME ASKING? WE'RE EVALUATING A COUPLE.

PROBABLY NOT COMFORTABLE TO SAY THIS AT THIS STAGE, BUT IT WILL BE ONE OF THE LARGEST MANUFACTURERS THAT ARE PUBLICLY TRADED.

AND THE FORT WORTH AREA.

AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY WISE, WE'RE MOST LIKELY GOING TO UTILIZE A THIRD PARTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY THAT OVERSEES A LOT OF THE NEW BUILD FOR COMMUNITIES TODAY.

SO OUR STRATEGY IS TO KIND OF PROVIDE A HIGH QUALITY, AFFORDABLE OPTION, AND WE WANT TO HAVE A THIRD PARTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY THAT THAT ALLOWS US TO DO SO. DO YOU HAVE A DEVELOPMENT LIKE THIS IN ANOTHER CITY?

[00:35:01]

SO WE'RE A HANDFUL OF EARLY STAGES ON ONE INDIANA AND ONE IN SOUTH FORT WORTH, AND THIS ONE AS WELL.

IT'S PLANNED TO START IN OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR IS WHEN WE CLOSE ON THE LAND.

I KNOW IT'S A REALLY BUT AMENITY CENTER YOU MENTIONED WILL BE STICK BUILT.

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING LIKE A POOL OR A POND OR A GAMING CENTER WHERE PEOPLE MIGHT GATHER AND PLAY BINGO OR WHAT? WHAT WOULD IT BE? YEAH, SO IT'S A TRADITIONAL CLUB LEASING FACILITY THAT YOU'D SEE ON A ON A SINGLE FAMILY FOR RENT COMMUNITY.

SO WE'LL HAVE OUR LEASING AREA AND WE'LL HAVE A, WE HAVE A PLANNED WORKOUT FACILITY AND THEN WE WILL HAVE THAT AMENITY AREA LEAD OUT INTO A POOL AREA AS WELL.

SO THE SITE ITSELF, IT'S GIVEN ITS PRELIMINARY PLOT, ITS EARLY STAGES.

WE'RE WORKING THROUGH SOME OFF SITE.

IT LAYS OUT THERE'S A LOT OF JURISDICTIONAL AREAS ON SITE THAT ARE AND EASEMENTS ALONG THE FRONTAGE AS WELL.

SO IT LAYS OUT NICELY FOR POCKET PARKS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

ALL RIGHT. I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.

I KNOW THIS IS ANOTHER EARLY QUESTION, BUT DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT THE RENTAL RATES WOULD BE FOR A HOME LIKE THIS? SO WE TYPICALLY TRY TO BE 15 TO 25% OF STICK BUILT PRODUCT, SO WE'LL BE A DISCOUNT ANYWHERE FROM 15 TO 25%.

SO OUR AVERAGE CHECK WRITE FOR A COMMUNITY OF THIS SIZE SQUARE FOOTAGE WISE, IT WILL BE ANYWHERE FROM 15 TO $1600, ASSUMING A 1000 TO 1050FT². SO.

A DISCOUNT TO BE JUST DOWN THE STREET FROM HERE.

AND WE THINK VERY SIMILAR AMENITIES, JUST DIFFERENT STRUCTURE.

RIGHT. WE'RE ABLE TO BE MORE EFFICIENT.

WE'RE ABLE TO MOVE QUICKER.

SO IT ALLOWS US TO BE MORE AFFORDABLE.

BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE INTERIORS OF HOW THESE HOMES ARE BUILT TODAY, THERE'S A LOT OF SIMILARITIES.

I'M A REALTOR. SO YEAH, SOME OF THESE NEW MOBILE HOMES, YOU WALK IN AND YOU CAN'T EVEN TELL THEY'RE MOBILE HOMES.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YOU MAY HAVE ALREADY ANSWERED THIS, BUT WHAT WAS THE SMALLEST SQUARE FOOTAGE? I ASKED THAT BECAUSE THE TINY HOME TREND IS PRETTY HOT.

IT IS. PEOPLE WANT TO DOWNSIZE.

SO IT WOULD BE COOL IF YOU HAD A SMALLER OFFERING.

BUT SO.

SO THE SMALLEST UNIT THEY'LL BE OFFERED IN THIS COMMUNITY WILL BE ABOUT 575FT².

OKAY. WOW. AND THEY ALL HAVE DEDICATED PORCHES.

SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE BREAK UP THE FACADE.

AND SO A LOT OF THOSE ONE BEDROOM UNITS WE THINK WILL DO WELL.

IT'S JUST WE DON'T THE PROBLEM IS YOU GET TOO DENSE IN A LOT OF THOSE SCENARIOS.

SO WE'VE GOT 10 TO 15%, ONE BEDROOMS PLANNED IN THIS COMMUNITY AND NOTHING SHARED WALLS, EVEN THE SMALL UNITS, NO SHARED WALLS.

THEY HUD HAS NOW BUILT HOMES THAT YOU CAN ACTUALLY CREATE AS DUPLEXES.

WE DON'T PLAN TO DO THAT.

WE WANT EVERYBODY TO HAVE THEIR OWN FOUR WALLS.

SO NO PLANS FOR DUPLEX UNITS.

OKAY. NOW I'M OFFICIALLY.

ARE YOU DONE NOW? I'M DONE NOW.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? SURE.

THANK YOU. SO THIS IS PROBABLY FOR YOU.

CRAIG. AND THIS DEVELOPMENT, WOULD IT BE ZONED AS A PD? BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY DIFFERENT PROPERTY SIZES? HOW? HOW HOME SIZES AND THE PROPERTIES OUTSIDE OF CITY LIMITS.

SO THERE'S NO ZONING.

COULD YOU TURN OFF YOUR MIC? YEAH, THERE'S NO ZONING THAT THE LAND USE ISN'T APPLICABLE IN THIS CASE BEING THAT IT'S IN THE ETJ, WE HAVE LIMITED JURISDICTION.

SUBDIVISION CONTROL IS BEING ONE OF THEM.

THAT'S WHY YOU'RE SEEING THE PLOT TODAY.

SO ENGINEERING TEAM AND FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THIS FOR WHAT AREAS WE DO HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THERE WILL BE CONNECTED TO CITY, SEWER AND WATER. SO THAT WAS THOSE ARE THINGS THAT WE LOOKED AT IN REVIEWING THIS PLAN.

BUT THE LAND USES IS NOT APPLICABLE.

HAVE YOU JUST. SORRY.

HAVE YOU DISCUSSED ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY LIMITS, OR IS THAT SOMETHING YOU WANT TO DO OR DON'T WANT TO DO? OR. WE EARLY ON DISCUSSED WITH WITH STAFF THE OPTION OF THAT AND GIVEN MAJORITY OF THE TIME PREFABRICATED HOMES ARE NOT ALLOWED WITHIN CITY LIMITS.

[00:40:02]

SO IT WAS A QUICKER DISCUSSION, SOMETHING WE'RE ALWAYS OPEN TO.

WE DON'T REALLY HIDE BEHIND THE USE ITSELF.

SO SOMETHING WE'RE ALWAYS OPEN TO AT THIS STAGE, THERE ARE NO PLANS FOR IT.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

OKAY. ROBIN.

OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR.

IF THERE'S NO MORE QUESTIONS.

I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THIS ITEM.

MR. FISHER. QUESTION BEFORE MOTION AND WOULD IT BE ADVANTAGEOUS FOR DEVELOPER OR CITY IF THIS WERE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL ON A CONTINGENCY THAT.

ANNEXATION TOOK PLACE WITHIN THE CITY.

MY UNDERSTANDING OF STATE LAW IS WE CANNOT MANDATE ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY.

BUT IF YOU WISH TO TABLE, I COULD LOOK INTO THAT AND GET A DEFINITIVE ANSWER TO YOU, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THAT'S SOMETHING WE CAN REQUIRE.

AND SINCE THIS IS ETJ.

OUTSIDE OF THE CITY.

IT'S REALLY BASED AROUND UTILITY USE, MORE OR LESS, BECAUSE WHAT THE GENTLEMEN DEVELOP ON THE LAND IS OUTSIDE OF THE CITY.

IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT.

WE DO HAVE LIMITED JURISDICTION WITH THE FIRE CODE.

THE FIRE MARSHAL HAS REVIEWED THE PLANS AND IT MEETS THE CODES WHERE APPLICABLE.

AND YES, THE ENGINEERING ASPECT, IT WILL BE CONNECTED TO CITY SERVICES, BUT IT IS OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS, LIKE I'VE INDICATED.

WE DO NOT HAVE ZONING AUTHORITY OVER THIS PROPERTY.

SO THINGS LIKE THE LIKE THEY'VE STATED OUR ZONING.

WE DO HAVE MANUFACTURED HOME DISTRICTS AND SO IF THEY WERE IN CITY LIMITS, THERE ARE ZONING DISTRICTS THAT COULD APPLY.

BUT WE DON'T HAVE THAT AUTHORITY HERE WITH THIS PROPERTY.

AND ONE LAST QUESTION.

SO LOOKING FORWARD ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, I WOULD ASSUME THAT THIS.

LAND OR AREA HAD ALREADY BEEN PEGGED.

SO THIS IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH FUTURE PLANNING OR USE.

CORRECT. THIS AREA IS DESIGNATED AS NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN.

SO THE PROPOSED USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT DESIGNATION.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

SO I WILL RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT TO COUNCIL FOR 202309369.

I HAVE A MOTION TO HAVE A SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. HAVE A MOTION A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. AYE.

MOTION CARRIES FOUR ZERO.

INFORMATION. NEXT MEETING.

[INFORMATION]

THANK YOU, GUYS.

NEXT MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 20TH, 2023.

BECAUSE THE CITY IS CLOSED ON JUNE 19TH IN OBSERVANCE OF JUNETEENTH.

NUMBER TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA AND NOT FOR DISCUSSION OF THESE REQUESTS AT THIS TIME.

ANYONE. THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT.

YEAH, NEVER MIND. OKAY.

ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CRAIG FOR UPDATES OF ONGOING PROJECTS? THEN I WILL ENTERTAIN.

I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. DO YOU HAVE AN UPDATE ON THE PROJECT WE ASKED YOU ABOUT OR I ASKED YOU ABOUT? I DO. I DON'T HAVE THE ANSWER YOU'RE LOOKING FOR.

I'M SORRY. WE'RE VERY BUSY, BUT WE HAVE ENGAGED A CONSULTANT AND WE'RE WORKING ON A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

UPDATE AS WE DISCUSSED LAST TIME IN REGARDS TO THE NEW FREEWAY, AND THAT IS ON THERE.

THEY'RE WORKING ON THAT.

[00:45:01]

THANK YOU, CRAIG. OKAY.

I REMEMBERED WHAT I WAS GOING TO ASK, BUT NOT NECESSARILY ONGOING PROJECT RELATED.

BUT LAST MEETING I BROUGHT UP ABOUT APPROVAL OF PROPERTIES, PARTICULARLY ONES WHERE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF RESIDENTS IN A TIGHT AREA AND HOW PRINCETON OR MAYBE PRINCETON FELT OR WHAT THEIR PROFESSIONAL INPUT WAS WITH REGARDS TO BEING ABLE TO PROTECT AND SERVE THE COMMUNITY.

RAPID INCREASE OF PEOPLE LIVING IN THE CITY.

DID YOU FIND ANYTHING ON THAT OR IF THEY WOULD BE INTERESTED IN WEIGHING IN OR PARTICIPATING IN THESE KIND OF DECISIONS WHEN WE MAKE ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS? YES, I WILL GET THEIR INPUT MOVING FORWARD.

TONIGHT, WE REALLY DIDN'T HAVE ANY ZONING CASES THAT WERE INTRODUCING ADDITIONAL HOUSING UNITS THAN WHAT HASN'T ALREADY BEEN APPROVED. AND THE LAST CASE, THAT PRELIMINARY PLAT IS OUTSIDE OF OUR POLICE'S JURISDICTION.

BUT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT DID LOOK AT IT AND REVIEW IT, AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND POLICE WILL CONTINUE TO BE PART OF OUR REVIEW.

THANK YOU, SIR. THAT IS ALL.

OKAY. ANYBODY WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.

ALL SECOND. HAVE A MOTION.

A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR.

SAY AYE. AYE.

MOTION CARRIES 4-0.

WE'RE ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.