Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:03]

ALL RIGHT. I CALL THIS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING TO ORDER. THE TIME IS 630.

[A. CALL TO ORDER-MAYOR]

TODAY IS MONDAY, MARCH 9TH, 2026. THIS TIME I'LL DO A ROLL CALL.

MR. GRAVES, IT'S NOT HERE, MISS TODD. HERE. MR. JOHNSON'S NOT HERE, MR. WASHINGTON HERE. MR. DEFFIBAUGH HERE, MR. LONG HERE. ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A QUORUM. AND AT THIS TIME, WE'LL HAVE OUR INVOCATION.

YEAH. IF EVERYBODY CAN PLEASE STAND.

FATHER, WE JUST COME TO YOU AND KNOW THAT THAT WE NEED YOUR HELP, LORD.

WE NEED YOUR HELP IN OUR OWN LIVES AND OUR HOMES AND IN OUR CITY.

GOD, WE JUST ASK YOU,FATHER, FOR WISDOM. LORD, YOUR WORD SAYS THAT IF ANY MAN LACK WISDOM, IF ANY WOMAN LACK WISDOM, THAT ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS ASK.

AND FATHER, WE ASK WISDOM IN EVERY DECISION THAT IS MADE.

FATHER, WE ASK FOR UNITY IN OUR DECISIONS. UNITY IN OUR CITY.

GOD. UNITY IN IN IN ADVANCING THIS THIS COMMUNITY, FATHER.

UNITY FOR EACH, FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL, EACH HOUSEHOLD.

EACH, EACH, CITY MEMBER. GOD. GOD, WE THANK YOU FOR IT.

LORD. WE PRAY FOR CREATIVITY. EVEN WITH THIS CITY COUNCIL.

LORD, THAT YOU WOULD GIVE THEM CREATIVITY WHEN IT COMES TO MAKING DECISIONS AND HOW TO ADVANCE THIS CITY.

LORD. LORD, I PRAY, FATHER, THAT YOU WOULD JUST WORK WITH THIS COUNCIL AND AND EVERY MEMBER, FATHER, THAT THAT WE WOULD BE BE AN EXAMPLE, AN EXAMPLE NOT ONLY IN TEXAS, BUT BUT IN THE UNITED STATES AS BEING ONE OF THE FASTEST GROWING CITIES IN AMERICA. LORD, GIVE US GIVE US THE WISDOM, THE CREATIVITY, THE UNITY TO SHOW OTHER CITIES AND HOW TO HOW TO RUN, HOW, HOW, HOW TO RUN A CITY, HOW TO ADVANCE THE CITY, HOW TO GROW A CITY.

LORD. LORD, WE THANK YOU. WE THANK YOU, LORD, FOR EVERY PERSON THAT'S PART OF THIS COMMUNITY.

AND LORD, I KNOW THAT THERE'S PEOPLE IN THIS COMMUNITY THAT ARE HURTING AND I JUST PRAY FOR THEM.

GOD, GOD, THAT YOU WOULD STRENGTHEN THEM, THAT YOU WOULD HEAL THEM, THAT YOU WOULD JUST MOVE IN THEIR HOMES.

LORD. LORD, FOR THOSE THAT ARE ARE STRUGGLING, GOD, WE JUST ASK FOR YOUR HAND UPON THEM.

GOD, AND WE JUST GIVE YOU THANKS FOR IT. IN JESUS NAME, AMEN.

AND DAVID GRACE HAS ARRIVED AT 6:33 FOR THE RECORD, THIS WILL TAKE US TO ITEM F PUBLIC APPEARANCE.

[F. PUBLIC APPEARANCE]

MISS COOK. THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS SET ASIDE FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ANY ITEM OF BUSINESS THAT IS NOT FORMALLY SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA AS A PUBLIC HEARING. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC SHOULD COMPLETE A PUBLIC MEETING APPEARANCE CARD PRIOR TO THE MEETING AND PRESENT IT TO THE CITY SECRETARY.

SPEAKERS ARE ALLOWED UP TO THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.

THE CITY COUNCIL IS UNABLE TO RESPOND TO OR DISCUSS ANY ISSUES THAT ARE BROUGHT UP DURING THIS PORTION THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA, OTHER THAN TO MAKE STATEMENTS OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO A SPEAKER'S INQUIRY, OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK SHALL ONE, ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECTLY, NOT CITY STAFF OR OTHERWISE, TWO, BE COURTEOUS, RESPECTFUL AND CORDIAL, AND THREE, REFRAIN FROM MAKING PERSONAL, DEMEANING, INSULTING, THREATENING AND DISPARAGING REMARKS AS TO MAINTAIN DECORUM AND SUPPORT THE EFFICIENT AND ORDERLY FLOW OF THE MEETING.

ALL RIGHT. FIRST WILL BE KEN SELIGMAN. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

KEN SELIGMAN, ARCADIA FARMS, MAYOR. COUNCIL MEMBERS.

I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT REALLY THE SAME TOPIC, COUPLE ISSUES.

WE RECENTLY RECEIVED A AUDIT REPORT ON THE COMMUNITY CENTER.

MAYOR. I WAS RECENTLY YOU MADE A NICE LONG POST ON FACEBOOK EXPLAINING THE PROCESS OF GOING THROUGH BOARD APPOINTMENTS AND EVALUATIONS OF HOW THAT PROCESS NEEDED TO BE RELOOKED AT AND, AND BASICALLY REDONE, EVALUATED HOW WE WERE DOING THINGS. AND IN GETTING THIS AUDIT REPORT, I THINK IT'D BE A REAL SHAME IF WE JUST TOOK THAT AND THREW IT IN A DESK AND SAY,

[00:05:07]

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. THERE WERE THINGS THAT HAPPENED IN THAT PROJECT NOTED IN, IN THE FINDINGS.

I THINK IT'S WORTH LOOKING BACK ON TO SEE HOW THAT HAPPENED, WHY, YOU KNOW, WHY DID WE SPEND THAT MUCH MONEY ON THAT PROPERTY, THE ACCOUNTING IRREGULARITIES, EVERYTHING THAT WAS DONE.

I THINK IF IT WAS WORTH DOING THE AUDIT, IT'S WORTH LOOKING BACK AND DECIDING, YOU KNOW, TAKING A LOOK AT THE PROCEDURES THAT GOT US THERE.

AND THAT WAS EXACTLY WHY THE CDC, THE MAIN REASON THAT THEY APPROVED IT IN THE FIRST PLACE WAS THEY WANTED TO TO BRING HEALING TO THE CITY, TO BRING TRUST TO THE CITY, TRUST OF OUR GOVERNMENT.

BUT THEY ALSO IN THE END, THEY SAID, YOU KNOW, WE'D LIKE TO LEARN IF THERE'S THINGS THAT WERE NOT DONE PROPERLY OR WE COULD IMPROVE ON.

WE'D LIKE TO LEARN. SO I HOPE WE CAN LEARN FROM THAT PROCESS.

AND IN DOING THAT, IN SAYING THAT THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL FINANCIAL APPROVALS THAT I'VE SEEN DONE, YOU KNOW, IN THE LAST, THIS LAST PERIOD, THIS YEAR, WHATEVER THAT I THINK COULD, SHOULD BE RELOOKED AT LOOK AT HOW, HOW WE MADE THEM AND, AND WHY IT HAPPENED THAT WAY.

ONE OF THEM IS THE MULTI GEN CENTER. AND THAT PROCESS OF HAVING TO SPEND THAT MUCH MONEY IS THREE QUARTERS OF A MILLION DOLLARS, I THINK, TO REDO THE DESIGN. AND WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE GOTTEN THAT PLATE TO THAT POINT WITHOUT HAVING DONE A SCOPING ESTIMATE.

ALL THE INFORMATION WASN'T AVAILABLE TO, TO ALL THE COUNCIL MEMBERS AND IN THE COMMUNITY EXACTLY WHAT WAS BEING DONE.

AND WHEN WE GOT FINALLY CLOSE ENOUGH THAT EVERYONE REALIZED WHAT WAS HAPPENING, THAT'S WHEN KIND OF COURSE WAS CHANGED.

AND THE SAME THING HAPPENED WITH THE DRAINAGE STUDY.

OKAY. IT'S YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO PUT FINANCIAL ENGINEERING OR SERVICES OUT FOR QUOTE, BUT WE SHOULD NEVER AWARD A CONTRACT LIKE THAT BASED ON THE SUBMISSION OF ONE VENDOR THAT THAT SHOULD HAVE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUT OUT TO OTHER VENDORS. SO I THINK WE SHOULD WE SHOULD LOOK BACK AT SOME OF THOSE THINGS AND HAVE THE COURAGE TO LOOK AT WHAT WE DID LOOK AT.

TAKE A LOOK AT THEM AND PUT SOME. YOU CAN HAVE 30 MORE SECONDS.

PUT SOME CONTROLS AND PROCESSES IN PLACE TO IMPROVE, JUST LIKE YOU SAID.

MAYOR. WE SHOULD. EVERYTHING WE SHOULD DO THAT WE DO AS A CITY, AS AS A COMPANY SHOULD BE A PROCESS OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.

AND WE SHOULD LOOK AT SOME OF THOSE THINGS. ANOTHER THING WAS WE'RE, WE'RE WELL SUITED TO WORKING WITH BUILDERS, FOR EXAMPLE. BUT WE'RE NOT WELL SUITED TO WORK WORKING WITH SMALL ENTREPRENEURS.

EXAMPLE ROLLER ROOM AND DOCTOR [INAUDIBLE] WHAT THEY WENT THROUGH.

WE SHOULD LOOK BACK AT THAT PROCESS, SEE WHAT HAD HAPPENED AND YOU KNOW WHY IT HAPPENED AND WHAT WE CAN DO BETTER TO HELP, YOU KNOW, SMALL ENTREPRENEURS THAT THAT DON'T HAVE STAFF AND EXPERIENCE OF, OF GOING THROUGH THAT PROCESS.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. TERESA MCGUINNESS, DID YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS? HELLO, I'M TERESA MCGUINNESS. I'M AT 512 BUCKEYE.

I'M GOING TO START BY SAYING THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I THINK THAT YOU ALL ARE DOING AN EXCELLENT JOB, AND I KNOW YOU DON'T HEAR IT VERY OFTEN AND IT'S VERY STRESSFUL POSITION.

I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR ALL THAT YOU ALL DO. THE REASON WHY I WANTED TO SPEAK TODAY WAS BECAUSE YOU GUYS ARE APPROVING THE BYLAWS, AND I WANTED TO DISCUSS THE CONSENT AGENDA. AND SO ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, IF SOMETHING'S PULLED FROM THE AGENDA, IT'S VOTED ON THAT SAME MEETING. AND I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE BETTER IF IT WAS ON THE NEXT MEETING.

AND ONE OF THE GOOD EXAMPLES IS THE NEW STRATEGIES AND SOLUTIONS CONTRACT THAT WAS FOR OUR RATE WATER STUDIES.

YOU KNOW, THERE WAS A BELIEF THAT, THAT THE COMPANY RUBBER STAMPED THAT WATER QUARTER AVERAGING COVER UP THAT WENT ON.

AND SO THE FINANCIAL, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER WHO SUBMITTED THAT CONTRACT, WELL, SHE WASN'T HERE.

AND FROM WHAT I'VE GATHERED WAS SHE CHOSE THEM BECAUSE THEY HAD ALREADY WORKED FOR OUR CITY.

WELL, SHE'S SHE'S A PRETTY, PRETTY GOOD PERSON.

WE'VE SEEN HER SPEAK AND SHE'S PRETTY SOLID. SHE DOESN'T SHE DOESN'T EVER LOOK UNCOMFORTABLE.

WELL, SHE LOOKED VERY UNCOMFORTABLE AFTER THAT, AFTER MY SPEAK, AND I DON'T THINK SHE REALLY UNDERSTOOD THAT. I THINK THAT IF SHE HAD BEEN

[00:10:04]

GIVEN ANOTHER WEEK, MAYBE SHE WOULD HAVE RETHOUGHT USING THAT COMPANY.

SO I THINK IF SOMETHING'S PULLED OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT IT IS.

IT SHOULDN'T BE JUST TURNED AROUND AGAIN. IT NEEDS TO BE, YOU KNOW, THOUGHTFULLY RESEARCHED AND LET IT GO OUT AGAIN AND SEE IF ANYTHING COMES BACK AND JUST VOTED ON, ON THE NEXT TIME AROUND. THERE'S NOTHING THAT THAT SHOULD BE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA THAT, THAT WOULD BE I DON'T, I DON'T KNOW HOW TO SAY IT VERY BIG.

ANYWAY, SO THAT'S REALLY WHAT I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT BEFORE YOU GUYS APPROVE IT.

WILL YOU PLEASE JUST APPROVE IT FOR THAT CHANGE? TO PUT IF SOMETHING'S PULLED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA, THAT IT JUST DOESN'T GET VOTED ON UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. ALLISON.

ALLISON GUERRERO, ARCADIA FARMS. I WANTED TO SPEAK ABOUT THE BYLAWS AS WELL.

I ACTUALLY AM ON THE HOMEROOM CHARTERS COMMITTEE, SO I JUST.

I READ THROUGH THE AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE BYLAWS ON THE AGENDA TODAY, AND I JUST WANTED TO MAKE A POINT TO LET YOU GUYS KNOW KIND OF WHERE WE ARE WITH THE HOMEROOM CHARTER, IN CASE YOU AREN'T FAMILIAR.

WE ARE THEY ARE PUTTING TOGETHER THE FINAL REPORT.

WE HAVE ONE LAST MEETING TO REVIEW THE FINAL REPORT AND APPROVE IT, AND THEN IT'S GOING TO YOU GUYS FOR APPROVAL, AND THEN WE'LL HOPEFULLY BE READY THEN FOR THE, I THINK, NOVEMBER, THE NOVEMBER VOTE FOR THE COMMUNITY TO VOTE AND DECIDE WHICH AMENDMENTS WOULD THEN BE APPROVED OR NOT. THE REASON I BRING THIS UP IS BECAUSE SOME OF THE AMENDMENTS IN THE BYLAWS ARE IN A LIKE EXACT MAYBE CONTRADICTION TO WHAT WE HAVE IN THE HOMEROOM CHARTER CHANGES.

SO YOU MIGHT JUST WANT TO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. I KNOW IF YOU APPROVE THE BYLAWS, THEY PROBABLY GO INTO EFFECT RIGHT AWAY. SO MAYBE JUST TAKE THE BYLAW COMMITTEE AND HAVE THEM MAYBE SET FOR A SECOND REVIEW AFTER THE VOTE IN NOVEMBER, OR MAYBE JUST TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.

THANK THANK YOU. AND I DON'T HAVE YOUR NAME HERE, BUT, MISS ELLIS, YOU SURE YOU DON'T WANT TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. THIS WILL TAKE US TO ITEM G, AND THIS WILL GO TO MISS DAVIS GRACE.

[G. ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST]

ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST. ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST FROM MARCH 9TH.

JOIN US FOR A REAL GOOD TIME ON SATURDAY, APRIL 18TH AT PRINCETON MUNICIPAL PARK AS WE DIVE INTO A FANTASTIC MORNING OF FISHING FRENZY. WHETHER YOU ARE PRO OR JUST LEARNING THE ROPES, WE'VE GOT SOMETHING FOR EVERY FISH IN THE SEA.

FISHING POLES AND BAIT WILL BE PROVIDED. RESERVE YOUR FISHING TIME SLOT AND BE SURE TO ARRIVE WITHIN YOUR SELECTED HOUR.

AND YOU CAN SIGN UP ON THE SIGN UP GENIUS THAT'S ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE.

READY TO START SPRING CLEANING? MARK YOUR CALENDARS FOR OUR ANNUAL TRASH COLLECTION EVENT ON APRIL 18TH AT J.M.

CALDWELL SENIOR COMMUNITY PARK. PROPERLY DISPOSE OF BULK TRASH, ELECTRONIC WASTE, TIRES, HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND MORE. PLEASE BE PREPARED TO SHOW A PRINCETON WATER BILL AND VALID DRIVER'S LICENSE.

MAKE SURE YOU'RE READY FOR ANYTHING. SIGN UP FOR PRINCETON ALERTS AND RECEIVE EMERGENCY ALERTS.

SEVERE WEATHER WARNINGS AND MORE. SIGN UP ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE.

[H. CONSENT AGENDA]

THANK YOU. THIS WILL TAKE US TO ITEM H, THE CONSENT AGENDA, MISS COOK.

ALL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS LISTED ARE CONSIDERED TO BE RETAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION.

THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS A COUNCIL MEMBER SO REQUESTS, IN WHICH EVENT THE ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED IN ITS NORMAL SEQUENCE ON THE AGENDA. WE HAVE H.11 THROUGH H 11.

ARE THERE ANY ITEMS COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE? ITEM H.9 AND H.10. IS THERE ANY OTHER ITEMS COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE? IF NOT AT THIS TIME, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE REMOVAL OF ITEMS H.9 AND H.10.

[00:15:07]

SECOND. ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A SECOND. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

AND WE WILL NOT BE GOING INTO EXECUTIVE AT THIS TIME.

[J. ACTION PERTAINING TO EXECUTIVE SESSION]

AND THERE IS ACTIONS PERTAINING TO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

AND AT THIS TIME I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THOSE ACTIONS. AND I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT 41 AND ASSOCIATED INCENTIVES, AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION, AND AUTHORIZED THE PDC CHAIRPERSON OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT.

I SECOND. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. THIS WILL TAKE US TO ITEM K.

ACTUALLY WE'LL START WITH H.9. MISS COOK. H.9 CONSIDER APPROVING THE EDC TO OFFER A COST OFFSET FOR THE FIRE HYDRANT AT

[H9. 2026-056 Consider approving the EDC to offer a cost offset for a fire hydrant at Princeton Pediatrics in the amount not to exceed $107,000, and take appropriate action.]

PRINCETON PEDIATRICS IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 107,000 AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.

MR. JIM WEHMEIER. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

JIM WEHMEIER, CEO OF THE EDC. THIS ITEM STEMS FROM A CONVERSATION SEVERAL MONTHS AGO THAT THIS COUNCIL HAD WITH MR. DOCTOR MOOLJI. THERE WAS HAVING SOME ISSUES.

THERE WAS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN A PREVIOUS FIRE MARSHAL AND CURRENT FIRE MARSHAL AND THE FIRE CODE ON WHETHER THERE WAS A HYDRANT NEEDED.

THERE WAS SOME PRETTY EXTENSIVE CONVERSATIONS AT THIS MEETING.

AND IF YOU REMEMBER, DURING THAT MEETING, I WALKED UP TO FRED GIBBS, WHO WAS HERE AT THE TIME, AND SAID, HEY, LET'S SEE IF WE CAN TABLE THIS AND I'LL GO TO THE EDC AND SEE IF WE CAN SEE IF WE CAN HELP OUT.

IT'S NOT THE THIS IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT'S NOT THE, THE BUSINESS'S FAULT REALLY WASN'T ANYBODY'S FAULT.

SOMETIMES THINGS HAPPEN. THE EDC DID VOTE TO DO A COST OFFSET ON THE COST OF THAT HYDRANT, WHICH WILL COVER NOT ONLY PRINCETON PEDIATRICS, BUT ABOUT FIVE ACRES ADJACENT BEHIND IT AS WELL.

AND THE EDC THE RECOMMENDATION OR THE APPROVAL, I'M SORRY, WAS TO, FOR A NOT TO EXCEED NUMBER OF 107,000. THERE'S ONE THING THAT THAT DOESN'T COVER, AND THAT IS THE BUSINESS OWNER'S BASICALLY HIS DEVELOPER FEE FOR HIS DEVELOPER TO MANAGE THE PROJECT. IT WAS, WE THOUGHT, QUITE HIGH.

AND SO THE DOCTOR SAID THAT'S FINE. HE WOULD NEGOTIATE THAT IF WE WOULD TAKE CARE OF THE ACTUAL INFRASTRUCTURE PORTION OF IT.

AND SO THE EDC BOARD HAS ALREADY APPROVED IT UNANIMOUSLY, AND WE SEND IT TO YOU ASKING FOR APPROVAL.

IF YOU DO APPROVE IT, WE ALREADY HAVE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT READY WITH WITH THE DOCTOR, AND WE'LL RELEASE THEM TO GET THAT HYDRANT PUT IN. WE'LL RELEASE HIM TOMORROW TO GET THAT PROCESS STARTED.

AND THEN THE BUDGET AMENDMENT WILL HAPPEN AT A LATER DATE WHEN KELLY BRINGS A LARGE BUDGET AMENDMENT TO THE COUNCIL THAT COVERS ALL CITY OPERATIONS.

THIS WILL BE PART OF THAT. BUT THE FUNDS WILL COME OUT OF OUR RETAINED EARNINGS.

AND I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR FOR MAKING THIS, THIS, THIS HAPPEN BECAUSE I KNOW THAT WE'RE HELPING A CURRENT BUSINESS OWNER IN PRINCETON.

I KNOW THEY HAD A HARD TIME GETTING THIS DONE, BUT I WANT TO THANK THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS HAPPEN FOR THEM.

OF COURSE, SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO DO WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO TO MAKE IT RIGHT.

AND SO. THANK YOU. I JUST WANTED IT TO BE PUT OUT THERE TO THE PUBLIC SINCE THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS IMPORTANT.

WE HAD A LOT OF RESIDENTS SHOW UP REGARDING THIS MATTER.

SO I APPRECIATE Y'ALL FOR STEPPING IN TO HELP A LOCAL BUSINESS BE ABLE TO OPEN THEIR DOORS.

SURE. YOU'RE WELCOME. ALRIGHT, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM H.9 2026 056.

I'LL SECOND. WE HAVE A SECOND. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

THIS WILL TAKE US TO H.TEN. MISS COOK. CONSIDER APPROVING THE ALTERNATE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT MODIFICATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF PRINCETON AND COLLIN COUNTY THAT

[H10. 2026-054 Consider approving the Alternate City Manager to execute a contract modification between the City of Princeton and Collin County that establishes the City's financial responsibility for dispatch services in the event the City withdraws from the Collin County Fire Service Agreement, and take appropriate action.]

ESTABLISHES THE CITY'S FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DISPATCH SERVICES IN THE EVENT THE CITY WITHDRAWS FROM COLLIN COUNTY FIRE SERVICE AGREEMENT AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.

GOOD EVENING COUNCIL. MY NAME IS SAMANTHA JONES. I'M THE DEPUTY CHIEF AND FIRE MARSHAL.

THIS IS CLEARLY IT'S JUST A CONTRACT MODIFICATION FOR US TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE THE CORRECT LANGUAGE IN THE CONTRACT,

[00:20:01]

THAT IF WE WERE TO PULL OUT OF COLLIN COUNTY DISPATCH OR COLLIN COUNTY'S FIRE SERVICE AGREEMENT THAT WE ARE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE FISCAL YEAR.

AT THIS TIME, WE HAVE NO INTENTION TO WITHDRAW FROM THAT.

IT'S JUST CLARIFYING THE LANGUAGE. MARSHALL, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT AT THIS TIME THAT THE CITY IS NOT PAYING ANY DISPATCH SERVICE FOR FIRE. THEY DO PAY FOR POLICE.

I'M NOT SURE OF THE AMOUNT THAT WE PAY, BUT I KNOW THAT THIS GIVES US THE ABILITY TO THAT.

THIS GIVES YOU THE ABILITY TO DO THAT AND ENTER INTO A CONTRACT.

BUT AT THIS TIME, WE DON'T PAY ANYTHING. I THINK THERE IS A TERMINATION IF WE IF WE EXIT THAT CONTRACT.

SO THAT'S SAYING THAT IF WE DO EXIT THAT CONTRACT, THEN THESE ARE OUR RESPONSIBILITIES.

RIGHT. YEAH. AND JUST JUST THE DISPATCH SERVICES FOR POLICE HAS DOUBLED FROM LAST, LAST YEAR.

SO I THINK THAT THAT'S, THAT'S KIND OF WHAT'S DRIVING THIS THIS TO BE.

THE REASON WHY I SAY THAT BECAUSE I WAS IN ON THE INITIAL NEGOTIATIONS MANY, MANY YEARS AGO.

MIGHT HAVE BEEN FOR THAT. THAT'S WHY IT'S FREE [LAUGHS] THAT.

WELL, IT'S NOT THE REASON WHY IT'S FREE, BUT BUT IT'S WHENEVER IT'S WHENEVER MCKINNEY QUIT DISPATCHING FOR THE FOR THE FIRE SERVICE OUT IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA WAS ON THE LOW BAND RADIO 37180. WE JUST WENT TO A NEW TRUNKING SYSTEM, TYPE ONE, AND AT THAT TIME WE NEGOTIATED WITH THE, THE FIRE ASSOCIATION NEGOTIATED WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO DO OUR DISPATCH, AND THEY DECIDED TO DO IT.

AND SINCE THAT TIME, SINCE I CAN REMEMBER, IT'S BEEN FREE.

FREE FOR THE FIRE SERVICE FOR ALL THE ALL THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS.

BUT I KNOW THE POLICE HAVE TO PAY FOR IT. SO YEAH, ONE DAY WE NEED ONE DAY IT WOULD COME TO THIS.

YEAH. THIS JUST GIVES US THE FLEXIBILITY WITHIN THE CONTRACT. EXACTLY.

YEAH. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THERE'S NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.

I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. YOUR HONOR, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM H.10 2026 054.

I SECOND. ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A SECOND. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

THIS WILL TAKE US TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA, STARTING WITH K.1. MISS COOK.

[K1. 2026-03-09-R05 Consider approving Resolution No. 2026-03-09-R05 acceptance and appropriation of $355,066.00 from the Princeton Community Development Corporation (CDC) to be allocated for the purchase of a replacement specialty emergency response vehicle from Terradyne Armored Vehicles, Inc. for the Princeton Police Department and take appropriate action.]

CONSIDER APPROVING RESOLUTION 2026-03-09-R05.

ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF $355,066 FROM THE PRINCETON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO BE ALLOCATED FOR THE PURCHASE OF A REPLACEMENT SPECIALTY EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLE FROM TERRADYNE ARMORED VEHICLES INCORPORATED FOR THE PRINCETON POLICE DEPARTMENT AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.

MR.. MAYOR. COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.

BEFORE WE GET TOO FAR INTO THIS I WANT TO FIRST THANK MR. WEHMEIER, MR. EVANS, AND OUR CDC BOARD FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY.

I KNOW MYSELF, THE PD, AND THEN OUR YOUNG, YOUNG MEMBERS OF OUR SWAT TEAM THAT ARE HERE ARE VERY, VERY EXCITED ABOUT THIS. SO ON FEBRUARY 18TH, 2026, CDC APPROVED FUNDING TO PURCHASE TERRADYNE.

WE WENT THROUGH AN RFP PROCESS GOT TWO BIDS AND THE TOTAL DONATION FROM CDC IS $355,000.66.

OBVIOUSLY, OUR RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THIS DONATION AND I'LL KIND OF GO HOW WE GOT HERE.

SO WHAT THIS VEHICLE WILL BE USED FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE USE FOR THIS VEHICLE IS GOING TO BE COMMUNITY OUTREACH.

AS YOU CAN SEE, WE HAD 12 OPERATIONS SINCE WE STARTED JULY OF 2024.

SO THE VAST MAJORITY OF THIS IS GOING TO BE COMMUNITY OUTREACH.

A LOT OF THESE COMMUNITY OUTREACH. SO 4TH OF JULY, IF YOU GUYS WENT TO THE HOMECOMING GAME THIS YEAR, YOU SAW HOW PACKED IT WAS. THESE ARE OPPORTUNITIES FOR US TO INTERACT WITH OUR POPULATION, OUR CITIZENS, AS WELL AS PROVIDE SECURITY. AND THAT'S KIND OF HOW WE LOOK AT THIS OTHER EVENTS, PARADES. SO. MR.. DEFFIBAUGH. THAT COULD BE YOU.

SO PARADES, OTHER CITY EVENTS. COFFEE WITH A, WITH A COP, WE HAVE SOME OTHER STUFF PLANNED FOR THIS VEHICLE.

THE. BUT I WANTED TO KIND OF EXPLAIN THE NEED FOR IT.

SO YOU GUYS HAVE ALL SEEN THE MRAP SITTING OUT THERE THAT CAME TO US FROM WILEY.

BEFORE THAT, IT WAS IN THE MILITARY. NOW, WHEN WILEY TOOK IT OVER, AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, THE MILITARY IS THE MILITARY.

AND IT WASN'T THE BEST PIECE OF EQUIPMENT WHEN WILEY GOT IT.

AND IT'S FOR SURE NOT THE BEST PIECE OF EQUIPMENT WHEN WE HAVE IT RIGHT NOW.

THE ISSUE AND THE REASON YOU DON'T SEE IT DRIVING AROUND THE STREETS WHEN WE HAVE HAD OPERATIONS, IT'S ONLY BEEN USED TWICE OUT OF THE 12 TIMES WE USED IT.

WHETHER IT'S BECAUSE IT WON'T FIT DOWN ANY OF OUR RESIDENTIAL STREETS, OR WE DIDN'T KNOW IF WE COULD MAKE IT TO OUR DESTINATION OR BACK BECAUSE OF THE QUALITY OF VEHICLE THAT IS CURRENTLY IN. RIGHT NOW WHEN YOU GET IT ONTO 380 AND YOU YOU GUN IT, WHICH IS NOT VERY FAST FOR AN MRAP IT HAS ISSUES

[00:25:10]

SWITCHING OUT OF FIRST GEAR. THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE SEEN THE MRAP KNOW THAT IT'S NOT JUST AN EVERYDAY TRANSMISSION LIKE THE THE TERRADYNE.

SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE COMPLETELY REBUILT BY OUR FLEET.

AND THE COST IS QUITE HONESTLY UNKNOWN BECAUSE IT'S NOT A NORMAL TRANSMISSION.

EVEN GOING A LITTLE BIT FURTHER, SO SWAT TEAM USING THIS.

SOME OF THE, SOME OF THE WARRANTS THAT WE'VE HAD TO USE A VEHICLE WITHOUT ARMOR ON WHICH IS PROBABLY THE MOST COMPELLING THING FOR US IS WE HAD A SHOOTING LAST YEAR. WE SERVED WARRANTS FOR THAT.

THE AREA THAT WE NEEDED TO SERVE THAT WARRANT WAS AN EXTREMELY TIGHT AREA OF THE CITY ROADWAY WISE.

AND WE COULDN'T FIT THE MRAP DOWN, DOWN THE STREET.

SO WHAT DO WE DO? WE'LL TAKE AS MANY TAHOES AS WE NEED.

WE ALL PILE IN, WE'LL STAGE, AND THEN WE KIND OF HANG OUT THE, THE SIDE WINDOW UNTIL WE GET TO OUR RESIDENTS THAT WE NEED TO.

AND THEN WE KIND OF BUNKER BEHIND THE, THE TAHOES, WHICH ARE NOT RATED FOR ANY TYPE OF AMMUNITION WHATSOEVER.

AND THEN WE WILL APPROACH THE, THE HOUSE OR THE RESIDENCE.

THE OTHER ISSUE IS WE HAD A BARRICADED SUBJECT.

HE WAS WANTED FOR. WE HAD WARRANTS FOR HIM FOR STALKING AND TERRORISTIC THREAT TOWARDS PEACE OFFICER.

HE BARRICADED HIMSELF IN A RESTAURANT JUST OUTSIDE OF THE CITY, IN A NEIGHBORING CITY.

WE DID NOT TAKE THE MRAP BECAUSE WE DIDN'T THINK IT WOULD MAKE IT TO THE CITY AND BACK DOWN 380.

THE OTHER ISSUE IS WHEN WE GO TO A NEIGHBORING AGENCY, YES, A LOT OF OUR NEIGHBORING AGENCIES, ESPECIALLY THE BIGGER ONES, DO HAVE ARMOR. IT'S NOT GUARANTEED TO LET US USE IT IN THIS CASE.

WE HAD THIS BARRICADED SUBJECT. WE WERE NOT ALLOWED TO USE THEIR ARMOR.

SO THERE'S, THEREIN LIES ANOTHER ISSUE. AND THEN AT SOME POINT, WE ARE BECOMING THE PREMIER AGENCY ON THE EAST, OR WE ARE THE PREMIER AGENCY ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIN COUNTY.

WE, WE HAVE TURNED INTO THE BIG BROTHER FOR THESE OTHER AGENCIES AROUND US.

THIS SOLIDIFIES THAT, RIGHT? SO WE HAVE TURNED INTO THAT AGENCY THAT OTHERS, OTHER PEOPLE ARE COMING TO AND NEED HELP.

AND THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF WHERE WE'RE AT WITH THIS. OTHER AREAS THAT WILL GET USED NATURAL DISASTERS.

SO TORNADOES, FLOODING, WINTER STORMS, INFRASTRUCTURE COLLAPSES.

IT'S ALL TERRAIN, FOUR WHEEL DRIVE. IT CAN HOLD A LOT OF PEOPLE.

IF YOU GUYS REMEMBER THE SNOWMAGEDDON THAT WE HAD A FEW YEARS AGO.

IT'S NOTHING FOR THIS TO GET OUT ON THE ROADWAY.

WE CAN FIND A BUNCH OF PEOPLE, PUT THEM IN THE BACK AND TAKE THEM TO WHEREVER WE NEED TO GO. THE SUSTAINABILITY FOR THIS, THIS IS A 15 TO 20 YEAR COMMITMENT FOR US. THIS ISN'T SOMETHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO GO OUT EVERY THREE OR SO YEARS AND GET A NEW ONE.

WE PLAN ON KEEPING THIS FOR A LONG TIME. IT HAS LOWER MAINTENANCE COSTS THAN THE MRAP.

IT'S ON A F-550 CHASSIS. SO OUR FLEET GUYS OVER THERE, THEY'RE PHENOMENAL.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THEY COULD WORK ON IN THEIR SLEEP.

AND IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY CAN'T FIX OR IT'S A WARRANTY ISSUE, WE CAN QUITE LITERALLY DRIVE IT DOWN TO THE FORD HOUSE AND THEY'LL FIX IT.

AND IT ONLY TAKES A CLASS C. SO RIGHT NOW THE MRAP IT'S SO HEAVY WE NEED A CLASS B DRIVER'S LICENSE.

AND I THINK WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE WITHIN THE PD THAT CAN DRIVE IT.

SO WE WENT THROUGH A FULL RFP PROCESS FOR THIS.

THIS IS JUST KIND OF SHOWING YOU THE THREE VEHICLES THAT WE LOOKED AT.

I'M NOT GOING TO GO INTO TOO TOO MUCH DETAIL UNLESS YOU GUYS HAVE QUESTIONS.

BUT WITH THESE THREE VEHICLES, ONLY TWO SUBMITTED FOR THE RFP.

ONE OF THEM DID NOT SUBMIT. AND THE OTHER ONE THAT DID SUBMIT WAS OUTSIDE OF OUR RFP GUIDELINES, WHICH WE DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING BIGGER THAN AN F-550 AND WE DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING OVER 400,000.

SO THE OTHER VEHICLE THAT DID SUBMIT DID NOT COME WITHIN THE RFP GUIDELINES.

SO WHAT TERRADYNE PROVIDES. SO WE HAVE ALL OF OUR BALLISTICS.

IT WILL STOP MOST EVERY ROUND THAT YOU COULD PROBABLY RUN INTO HERE IN PRINCETON.

THE BIGGEST PART OF THIS IS IT'S F550 CHASSIS WITH THE CLASS C DRIVER'S LICENSE.

I CAN'T STRESS THAT ENOUGH THAT THIS IS A VEHICLE, THAT ONE WE CAN WORK ON, AND IT'S HALF THE SIZE OF OUR MRAP.

SO WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT COMMUNITY POLICING, WE HAVE KIDS GETTING IN AND OUT OF IT.

WE DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THEM FALLING SIX, SEVEN FEET OUT OF AN ARMORED VEHICLE AND HURTING THEMSELVES.

AND IT'S MISSION READY UPON DELIVERY. SO ONCE WE GET INSURANCE ON IT, WE CAN USE IT FOR JUST ABOUT WHATEVER WE NEED.

WE HAVE WARRANTIES ON IT. SO THREE YEARS FOR ANY OF THE ARMOR STUFF AND THEN YOUR NORMAL FORD POWERTRAIN WARRANTIES.

[00:30:01]

IT'S WITH AND IT'S DIESEL ENGINE. AND SO THE TOTAL COST OF THIS IS $355,066.

THE OTHER GREAT PART ABOUT TERRADYNE IS THEIR DELIVERABLE WITHIN SEVEN MONTHS ISH.

EVERY OTHER MANUFACTURER WAS ABOUT A YEAR, YEAR AND A HALF.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME? NO. I'M EXCITED ABOUT THIS, TO BE HONEST WITH YOU. I THINK THAT JUST IF ANYBODY SPENT ANY TIME WITH THE POLICE, WE KNOW THAT WE WE WE NEED THIS. WE KNOW THAT WE WANT TO KEEP OUR OFFICERS SAFE.

HAVING TO SEE THEM USE SOME OF THE VEHICLES THAT THEY HAVE USED IN SOME OF THE EVENTS, I WOULDN'T RECOMMEND IT.

I THINK THAT EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE DOING THEY'RE AMAZING GUYS, THEY'RE WELL TRAINED, BUT I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND KIND OF PUTTING YOUR GUYS IN THOSE TYPE OF SITUATIONS. SO I THINK THAT WE ARE AT THE THE LEVEL OF A CITY WHERE WE NEED THIS.

I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE ONLINE WAS SAYING WE CAN USE THE MONEY FOR ROADS.

I THINK THAT THIS, THIS, THIS MONEY IS ALLOCATED STRICTLY FOR, FOR THIS EVEN THE CDC FUNDS ARE STRICTLY FOR CERTAIN THINGS.

AND THAT'S GROWING THE COMMUNITY IN THESE, IN THESE TYPE TYPE OF WAYS.

SO I BELIEVE THAT THIS IS DEFINITELY A BENEFIT TO, TO THE THE COMMUNITY.

AND YEAH, I'M, I SUPPORT THIS 100%. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY.

I AGREE WITH YOU, MAYOR. IT'S ESPECIALLY WITH ALL THE GROWTH THAT WE HAVE AND WE KNOW THINGS CHANGE EVERY DAY.

SO I THINK THIS IS A GREAT INVESTMENT FOR OUR PD.

SO I JUST ALSO LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT THAT THAT NO AD VALOREM TAXES ARE BEING USED TO PURCHASE THIS.

THIS IS ALL FROM SALES TAX. THAT'S FROM ANYONE THAT COMES IN THE SHOPS IN THE CITY OF PRINCETON.

SO IS THAT CORRECT? SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE BECAUSE LOTS OF PEOPLE START COMPLAINING THAT WE'RE SPENDING TAX DOLLARS AND THEY CONFUSE, THEY CONFUSE THE TWO. AND TECHNICALLY THEY'RE RIGHT, BUT THEY'RE SALES TAX AND PROPERTY TAX, AS YOU KNOW, ARE VERY DIFFERENT. PROBABLY HALF OF OUR SALES TAX THAT WE BRING IN ARE FROM PEOPLE THAT DON'T EVEN LIVE IN PRINCETON, BECAUSE WE'RE A BIT OF A HUB FOR THIS AREA OVER HERE.

JUST REALLY BRIEFLY, I WANT TO SHARE THE TWO THINGS THAT THE BOARD THAT REALLY SET IN WITH THE BOARD, THE COMMUNITY POLICING. OBVIOUSLY, THE BOARD THOUGHT IT WAS A BIG DEAL, BUT THE BIGGEST THING, QUITE HONESTLY, IS WHEN CODY TOLD THE STORY OF HAVING TO RELEASE A SWAT TEAM INTO A DANGEROUS SITUATION AND MAYOR YOU HIT ON IT WITHOUT COMING OUT AND SAYING IT.

BUT THEY HAD TO COMMANDEER TWO PUBLIC WORKS VANS WITH ZERO PROTECTIVE COATING ARMOR ON IT AT ALL, AND THAT MADE THE HAIR ON THE BACK OF MY NECK STAND UP.

I WOULDN'T WANT TO DO THAT. I MEAN, I APPRECIATE Y'ALL DOING IT, BUT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO CATCH ME TRYING TO DO THAT.

AND YES SIR, IT IS 100% SALES TAX INCOME TO THE CDC.

I JUST WANT TO SAY IT'S IT'S EXCITING THAT WE'RE GETTING THIS VEHICLE, BUT ALSO DAUNTING AND SCARY AT THE SAME TIME.

WE HAVE GROWN QUITE A LOT AND I'VE SEEN THE GRAVITY OF CRIMES INCREASE.

AND SO I KNOW THAT THIS IS IMPORTANT, ESPECIALLY FOR YOUR PROTECTION AS THE POLICE AND FOR OUR PROTECTION AS A CITY.

BUT I ALSO I HEARD YOU MENTIONED SOMETHING AND I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT IT.

YOU MENTIONED THAT WE'VE BECOME THE BIG BROTHER FOR OUR CITIES AROUND.

NOW WE'RE SPENDING $355,000 TO PURCHASE THIS VEHICLE.

SO HAVE WE CONSIDERED ADDING AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR THE CITIES THAT WE SERVE? IF WE HAVE TO GO IN FOR TO SERVE THEM OR TO HELP PROTECT IN ANY WAY, ARE WE.

GOING TO CHARGE THEM FOR US? TIME, EQUIPMENT USE AND ALL OF THOSE THINGS.

COUNCIL MEMBER GRAVES. SO RIGHT NOW, WITH THE GROWTH THAT WE ARE PROJECTING OUT AND THE GROWTH BETWEEN SOME OF THE OTHER CITIES THAT'S AROUND US, WE'VE ENTERED INTO SOME INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS AND, AND WE'LL KIND OF TALK ABOUT SOME OF THOSE THINGS ON THIS NEXT PRESENTATION THAT WE GIVE OUT TO AS WELL. SO THOSE IN OUR LOCAL AGREEMENTS, LIKE THEY HELP US OUT IN SOME AREAS, WE HELP THEM OUT IN SOME AREAS.

AND IT'S KIND OF ONE HAND SOMEWHAT WASHES THE OTHER.

AND TOGETHER WE KIND OF RISE UP. SOME OF THE OTHER AGENCIES, WHENEVER WE WERE A LITTLE BIT SMALLER, WE NEEDED THAT HELP TO AS WELL, BUT YET WE COULDN'T AFFORD IT.

RIGHT. AND SO WE, WE DO HAVE TO TRY TO HELP OUT AS MUCH AS WE CAN AND, AND KIND OF DO OUR PART WITHOUT REALLY HOLDING THE CITY OUT TO LIABILITY. RIGHT? AS FAR AS LEAVING US UNPROTECTED OR ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES. SO WE TRY TO HELP OUT WHERE WE CAN AND WHEN WE CAN AND ALL THAT STUFF. BUT ON THE BACK END, WE DO TRY TO MAKE UP WITH IT WITHIN THE LOCAL AGREEMENTS.

THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT. IT'S IMPORTANT, I BELIEVE, FOR US TO DISCUSS THESE SO THAT RESIDENTS LISTENING WILL ALSO KNOW THAT WE DON'T WE'RE NOT AN ISLAND. WE'RE NOT ALONE. WE WORK TOGETHER AND CITIES DO WORK TOGETHER AND HELP EACH OTHER.

AND SOMETIMES THE COST OR THE BENEFIT CANNOT BE EQUATED TO DOLLARS.

IT'S IN-KIND SOMETIMES. YEAH. AND THEN JUST JUST TO PIGGYBACK ON THAT WE HAVE TO REALIZE TOO THAT THE POSITION THAT WE'RE IN,

[00:35:04]

JUST AS A CITY, WE HAVE TO, WE HAVE TO WORK AS A REGION.

I THINK KEN BROUGHT THIS UP A FEW TIMES. WE HAVE TO WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORING CITIES TO GET TO THE POSITION THAT THAT WE NEED TO BE IN, JUST BECAUSE OF WHAT STATE IS DOING. WE HAVE REGULATIONS COMING OUT ALL THE TIME WHERE UNFORTUNATELY, IT'S HARD FOR A CITY TO EVEN RUN.

SO WE HAVE TO DEPEND ON THE REGIONAL, A REGIONAL EFFORT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE CITIES AROUND US, NOT ONLY US, BUT, YOU KNOW, LOOK, EVERYBODY ELSE AROUND US CAN CAN SUCCEED TOO, BECAUSE A LOT OF THAT COMES DOWN ON ON US AND IT'S JUST US.

SO. SO WHILE BACK, I HAD ASKED WATERS FOR SOME STATISTICS AND I WAS JUST NOW LIKE REDOING THE MATH.

WITH THE CDC DOING THIS YOU'RE THE COST OF MAINTENANCE FOR THIS VEHICLE, THE CURRENT VEHICLE FOR THE EQUIVALENT OF HOW MUCH WE'RE SPENDING TODAY IS LIKE FOR 2.37 YEARS WORTH OF MAINTENANCE COSTS THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ON THE CURRENT VEHICLE IS THE COST OF THE NEW VEHICLE THAT'S GOING TO COME WITH A FIVE YEAR WARRANTY AND ALL THAT.

AND THIS IS ALSO MEANING THAT'S MONEY THAT OUR PD IS GOING TO BE ABLE TO SAVE FROM ALL OF THOSE MAINTENANCE COSTS.

I MEAN, WE'RE LOOKING AT 20,000 FOR NEW TIRES.

I MEAN, THERE'S 69,000 FOR SOME OTHER STUFF. LIKE THERE'S THE COSTS FOR THE CURRENT VEHICLE TO BE BROUGHT UP TO STANDARD FOR USE. I MEAN, ASIDE FROM THE BEING SPONGED OVER AND LIKE HAVING TO BRACE YOURSELF WHILE DRIVING I THINK THAT THIS, WHEN YOU LOOK, WHEN YOU TAKE A STEP BACK AND YOU REALIZE THAT THIS ONE PURCHASE THAT THE CDC IS DOING FOR THE PD IS THE EQUIVALENT OF 2.37 YEARS WORTH OF MAINTENANCE THAT THE PD WOULD BE TAKING OUT OF THEIR BUDGET.

I THINK THIS IS A VERY GENEROUS OF THE CDC TO BE DOING.

I THINK IT'S BENEFICIAL TO THE PD, ESPECIALLY FOR THEIR BUDGET.

IT'S SOMETHING THAT WATERS CAN TURN BACK AROUND AND PUT INVESTING INTO HIS OFFICERS.

SO I, I THINK THAT YOU GUYS, YOU DID IT. YOU PUT A LOT OF WORK INTO IT.

VERY DETAILED REPORT THAT YOU GAVE ME WITH ALL ANSWERING ALL MY QUESTIONS.

JUST THANK YOU ALL FOR WHAT YOU WHAT YOU DO. IF I CAN MAKE A COMMENT.

THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION AND ANSWERED ALL MY QUESTIONS WITHOUT ME HAVING TO ASK THEM MAINLY TO DO WITH THE MAINTENANCE.

SO THANK YOU, MISS TODD, FOR BRINGING UP THE THE COMPARISON TO THE MAINTENANCE COST OF THE CURRENT VEHICLE AND THIS NEW ONE.

AND I APPRECIATE THAT THE RFP PROCESS CAME TO THE FORE.

AND I'M SURE YOUR MAINTENANCE WILL APPRECIATE A BRAND NEW VEHICLE TO MAINTAIN FOR THE LIFE FOR THE 15 TO 20 YEARS WILL GET THE BEST BEST FOR OUR MONEY WITH THAT. SO I APPRECIATE YOU.

I APPRECIATE CHIEF WATERS LEADING THIS DEPARTMENT IN OUR COUNTY, MAKING US SO RELIABLE AND DEDICATED. YOU ALL FILL IN THE GAP WHERE SO MANY PEOPLE WILL RUN AWAY.

SO WE CAN'T THANK YOU ENOUGH. AND I THINK ONE OF THE BEST WAYS WE CAN THANK YOU IS HELPING OUT WITH EQUIPMENT WHEREVER WE CAN.

SO THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THERE'S. NO QUESTION, YOUR HONOR.

IF THERE'S NO QUESTIONS. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM K.1 2026-03-09-R05 SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. BEN, SECOND.

MISSING A VOTE. ALL RIGHT. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

THANK THANK YOU GUYS. THANK YOU. SO TAKE US TO ITEM K-2 MISS COOK, CONSIDER APPROVING RESOLUTION

[K2. 2026-03-09-R01 Consider approving Resolution No. 2026-03-09-R01 accepting a proposal from Federal Engineering, Inc. and authorizing a contract to perform a Public Services Dispatch Center Feasibility Study in the amount of $79,260.00; and take appropriate action.]

2026-03-09-R01. ACCEPTING A PROPOSAL FROM FEDERAL ENGINEERING INCORPORATED AND AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT TO PERFORM A PUBLIC SERVICES DISPATCH CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY IN THE AMOUNT OF $79,260 AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.

CHIEF WATERS MR. MAYOR, COUNCIL, JAMES WATERS, CHIEF OF POLICE FOR THE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT.

AS YOU ALL AWARE, WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF DESIGNING OUR NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT OR PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING.

SO BECAUSE OF SOME UNFORESEEN COSTS THAT ARE RISING OUT THERE WITHIN DISPATCH AND, AND I KIND OF HEARD A LITTLE BIT EARLIER WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT KIND OF GOING THROUGH THAT WE TEND TO LOOK AT THE FACT OF RUNNING OUR OWN DISPATCH WHEN WE HAVE SOME HIGH NUMBER OF CALLS THAT'S KIND OF GOING OUT THERE AND TO SOME OF THE BENEFITS THAT'S GOING TO GO IN LINE WITH THAT. SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, WE WERE LOOKING AT THREE DIFFERENT PHASES FOR OUR PS BUILDING OR PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING,

[00:40:08]

AND ONE OF THOSE EITHER SECOND OR THIRD PHASE, WE'RE LOOKING AT PUTTING THE DISPATCH CENTER IN THERE, BUT DUE TO SOME OF THE RISING COSTS THAT'S OUT THERE AND DUE TO THE HIGH CALL VOLUMES THAT'S COMING IN TO AS WELL, WE'RE LOOKING AT ACTUALLY MOVING THE DISPATCH CENTER INTO PHASE ONE.

AND SO BEFORE WE JUST GO AHEAD AND JUST MOVE THAT DISPATCH CENTER TO PHASE ONE, WE'RE GOING TO NEED TO END UP RUNNING A FEASIBILITY STUDY OR SCOPING OUT THE AGREEMENT OF WORK THAT'S OUT THERE, AS MR. KENT STATED EARLIER.

SO WITHIN THAT, WE WENT AHEAD AND WORKED WITH FINANCE AND GOT WENT THROUGH AN RFQ PROCESS TO WHERE THREE DIFFERENT VENDORS PUT IN FOR AN RFQ PROCESS.

AND THROUGH THAT, THROUGH THAT PROCESS, WE DECIDED TO GO WITH FEDERAL ENGINEERING.

WITHIN THAT PROCESS, THERE WAS AN EVALUATION THAT ENDED UP GOING THROUGH EVERYTHING.

AND WITHIN THAT EVALUATION, THEY WERE ABLE TO KIND OF MEET SOME OF THESE NEEDS.

AND THIS SHOWS US WHAT'S ALL INCLUDED WITHIN THERE.

AND SO WITHIN THAT INCLUSION, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT GETTING OUR OWN DISPATCH SYSTEM.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT GETTING OUR OWN IT INFRASTRUCTURE WITHIN THEIR ABLE TO DO OUR OWN CALL REPORTING, NOT JUST FOR POLICE, BUT FOR FIRE AND FOR EMS TOO, AS WELL.

AND SO ALL JOINT EFFORTS WILL BE SITTING THERE IN ONE DISPATCH CONSOLE, AS MR. DEFFIBAUGH WILL BE ABLE TO TELL YOU WHENEVER YOU RUN 2 TO 3 DIFFERENT CONSOLES, THEY DON'T NECESSARILY ALWAYS TALK TO ONE ANOTHER.

AND SO YOU'LL EXPERIENCE DELAYED TIMES AND STUFF ALONG THOSE LINES WHERE HE CAN ACTUALLY TELL YOU WITHIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT SOMETIMES THAT THEY'LL ACTUALLY RECEIVE THEIR DISPATCH CALLS ABOUT A MINUTE OR TWO LATER THAN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL.

AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT TAKES A MINUTE OR TWO FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO KIND OF WAKE UP ANYWAYS.

SO WE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND GET THEM UP AND GET GOING.

SO I'M SORRY, STEVE, I HAD TO DO IT SINCE YOU GOT ME LAST TIME [LAUGHS].

SO THIS IS ESSENTIALLY WHAT IT KIND OF LOOKS LIKE.

OF COURSE, YOU ALL HAVE TO BE COMING FROM DUNKIN DONUTS OR WHERE.

YEAH. YEAH, DEFINITELY 100%. SO ESSENTIALLY THIS IS WHAT IT KIND OF LOOKS LIKE WITH INSIDE, RIGHT? SO IT, IT ABLES, IT JUST ESSENTIALLY JUST GIVES US CONTROL, RIGHT? BETWEEN ALL THE MDTS, THE RMS. SYSTEMS, I'M SORRY, THE MOBILE DATA TERMINALS, THE REPORT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INSIDE THERE, BUT ALSO SOME OF THE OTHER INFRASTRUCTURES THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT USING IS THE LIVE CRIME MAPPING CENTERS, THE USE OF THE DRONES THAT ARE OUT THERE, THE USE OF THE, THE OR THE CAMERAS, THE STOPLIGHT CAMERAS, STUFF LIKE THAT. WE'RE ABLE TO KIND OF INTERFACE WITH THE SCHOOL AND UTILIZE THEIR SECURITY SYSTEM TOO AS WELL. AND SO WE'RE ABLE TO KIND OF BUILD THIS TECHNOLOGY AROUND OUR DISPATCH CENTER THAT'S GOING TO END UP BEING INSIDE THERE. SO THE FEASIBILITY FOR US, RIGHT, TO BE ABLE TO SIT THERE AND IMPLEMENT THIS PROGRAM. I'M SORRY TO LOOK AT THE FEASIBILITY OF THE PROGRAM. IT'S GOING TO BE ROUGHLY ABOUT $79,260.

AND SO WITHIN THAT $79,260, ONE THING THAT I'VE ASKED THIS COMPANY TO GO AHEAD AND DO, AND THIS IS KIND OF GETTING TO WHERE WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT EARLIER WAS TO WORK WITH THE OTHER AGENCIES THAT ARE OUT THERE. SO WE'RE STARTING TO WAS TALKING ABOUT BEING THAT BIG BROTHER, RIGHT. AND SO THIS IS WHERE I WAS TALKING TO MISS GRAVES, TALKING ABOUT THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. SO THIS IS WORKING WITH SOME OF THESE OTHER AGENCIES. NOTHING IS PROMISED YET, RIGHT. WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT IT.

BUT WORKING WITH SOME OF THESE OTHER AGENCIES TO WHERE THEY MIGHT HELP PAY FOR FULL TIME EMPLOYEES OR DISPATCHERS OR SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES.

IF WE TAKE ON THE CAPITAL ASSET INFRASTRUCTURE UP FRONT, THEY PULL, THEY PAY FOR THE DISPATCHERS ON THE BACK END.

AND THEN THAT WAY WE'RE ABLE TO KIND OF IMPLEMENT THE PROCESS, THE PROGRAM, RUN THE PROGRAM AT THE EXPENSE OF ANOTHER CITY, AND THEN WE IMPLEMENT IT OUT FOR THE CITY OF PRINCETON PLUS THOSE CITIES AS WELL.

WELL, THE ISD ALSO BE SINCE IT'S GOING TO BE WORKING WITH ISD, WILL THEY ALSO BE CONTRIBUTING TOWARDS THIS? HAVE WE APPROACHED THEM ON THAT? YES, MA'AM. SO ONE THING THAT WE DID DO IS WE CONTACTED I WOULD SAY SEVEN, EIGHT DIFFERENT ENTITIES, CITIES AROUND THE AREA.

I DON'T REALLY KIND OF WANT TO GO OUT AND LIST ALL THE NAMES OUT THERE AND ALL THAT STUFF JUST QUITE YET. RIGHT? SO WE'RE NOT TRYING TO WE'RE NOT TRYING TO GET IN A BAD DISAGREEMENT WITH ANY ENTITY THAT'S OUT THERE RIGHT NOW, BUT JUST ASK THEM IF THEY WOULD BE INTERESTED IN LOOKING AT THIS.

SOME OF THE OTHER CITIES ENDED UP APPROACHING US ONCE THEY HEARD THAT KIND OF GETTING OUT THERE, ASKING IF THEY CAN JOIN ON BOARD TOO AS WELL.

THE MAJORITY OF THESE CITIES HAVE THE CITY POLICE, THE CITY FIRE, AMBULANCE SERVICES THAT ARE CONTRACTED OUT, AND ALSO THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENTS TOO, AS WELL.

SO EACH CITY THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT, YOU'RE LOOKING AT ABOUT THREE TO 4 TO 5 DIFFERENT ENTITIES WITHIN THOSE CITIES.

AND HOW MANY HYPOTHETICALLY, HOW MANY ENTITIES JOINING IN WOULD COVER THE ANNUAL COST. AND THAT'S, THAT'S WHERE I NEED THE FEASIBILITY STUDY, BECAUSE I CAN COME UP WITH ALL SORTS OF DIFFERENT RATIOS AND RATIONALE AND ALL THIS STUFF THAT'S GOING TO BE BEHIND THERE. BUT I WANT SOMEBODY WHO DOES THIS FULL TIME FOR A LIVING THAT'S GOING TO BE ABLE TO TELL US HOW MUCH THESE COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS ARE GOING TO COST, HOW MUCH THE DISPATCH TERMINAL IS GOING TO END UP COSTING, HOW MUCH THE RADIOS ARE GOING TO COST. WHAT IT'S GOING TO COST TO GET A DIGITAL BROADBAND WAY FROM HERE TO THE OTHER CITY THAT'S ACROSS THE WAY.

[00:45:03]

SOMEONE HAS DONE THIS BEFORE AND BROKE DOWN A MULTITUDE OF DIFFERENT THINGS.

SO THAT'S PART OF THE REASON WHY WE WENT WITH THIS FEDERAL ENGINEER COMPANY IS THEY'RE ONE OF THE LEADING EDGE INDUSTRIES THAT WAS OUT THERE THAT DID THIS ALREADY TIME AND TIME AGAIN. SO THERE'S A POTENTIAL THAT WE CAN RECOUP THIS AMOUNT THAT WE'RE DOING NOW SIMPLY FROM TAKING ON THE CONTRACTS. POTENTIALLY. POTENTIALLY. YES, MA'AM.

OKAY. YEAH, I THINK AND THIS IS JUST ME. I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK OUT OF TURN.

I THINK NOT ONLY CAN WE RECOUP THIS AMOUNT, BUT WE CAN ALSO GET THOSE FTES, THE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES.

RIGHT. AND SO EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT FULL TIME EMPLOYEES, THAT'S USUALLY YOUR HIGHEST BASIS WITHIN YOUR BUDGET, RIGHT, IS FULL TIME EMPLOYEES. WE CAN GET THE MAJORITY OF THESE DISPATCHERS COVERED.

AND SO BY US HOUSING THE PROGRAM AND US HOLDING THE CAPITAL ASSETS AS FAR AS ALL THE RADIO TERMINALS AND ALL THIS STUFF, AND THEN US CONTRACTING OUT, DOING THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS WITH THESE OTHER AGENCIES, THEY CAN PAY FOR THE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES.

AND JUST TO PIGGYBACK ON THAT, THERE ARE GRANT FUNDING.

THERE'S GRANT FUNDING AVAILABLE THAT WE CAN ALSO.

YES, MA'AM. THERE'S. YES, MA'AM. SO WHENEVER YOU WHENEVER YOU DO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS OR THE COOPERATIONS, THE CO OPS THAT'S OUT THERE AND ALL THAT STUFF. YES, MA'AM. SO GRANT FUNDING DOES BECOME AVAILABLE TO US AT THAT POINT IN TIME.

SO ONCE WE GET IT, IT'S NO DIFFERENT THAN IF YOU'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH THE SOLANA AND MELISSA PRINCETON ILA THAT I DID PROBABLY ABOUT 3 OR 4 MONTHS AGO.

SO WE DID A MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL ILA, AND THAT'S KIND OF WHAT SERGEANT WAS TALKING ABOUT.

AND WE WENT TO. BUT THAT'S WHAT SERGEANT WAS TALKING ABOUT A SECOND AGO.

WHENEVER I SAID, COME UP AND TALK TO YOU ABOUT IT.

SO ANNA IS PRODUCING THEIR OWN MOBILE COMMAND TRAILER.

SAVANNAH HAS ONE OF THEIR SWAT TEAMS THAT'S OUT THERE, WHICH IS PRETTY MUCH WORKING TOGETHER AS A BACKUP TEAM.

MELISSA HAS A DRONE UNIT THAT THEY'RE KIND OF ROLLING, AND SO WE ALL KIND OF PIGGYBACK OFF ONE ANOTHER TO HELP BUILD SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT SUPERIOR. SAME CONCEPT. AND THEN I'M NOT I'M NOT SURE WE CAN TALK ABOUT IT, BUT THE, THE SAFETY ASPECT OF HAVING OUR OWN DISPATCH. I WROTE WITH YOU GUYS A FEW TIMES AND JUST KIND OF GETTING A CALL OUT AT TIMES CAN BE HARD BECAUSE EVERY CITY IN THE COUNTY IS KIND OF ON THE SAME VAN.

SO THIS, THIS NOT ONLY JUST US GETTING INTO, YOU KNOW, OUR OWN DISPATCHING, BUT JUST FOR SAFETY REASONS AS WE GET MORE CALLS AND WE, WE MIGHT MISS THINGS THAT ONE MINUTE, TWO MINUTES ACTUALLY MATTERS.

SO ESPECIALLY IF SOMETHING'S HAPPENING TO AN OFFICER OUT THERE IN THE FIELD, THEY NEED TO BE ABLE TO CALL IMMEDIATELY.

SO I THINK THAT GOING ON DISPATCHING IT JUST, IT JUST MAKES SENSE AT THIS TIME.

YES, SIR. YEAH, DEFINITELY. IT'S REALLY BEEN A LONG TIME COMING.

SOMETHING'S NEEDED. I MEAN, EVEN THE FIRE SERVICE MANY YEARS AGO BEFORE THE POLICE WAS LOOKING AT A, A DISPATCH SERVICE JUST FOR THE FIRE SERVICE BECAUSE THE, THE COUNTY AND IT WAS ALL TIED UP ON MANY OTHER THINGS.

SO. BUT I THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA. AND IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM K.2 2026-03-09-R01. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION. I'LL SECOND.

ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A SECOND. ALL RIGHT. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS WILL TAKE US TO K3.

[K3. 2026-03-09-R02 Consider approving Resolution No. 2026-03-09-R02, approving a revised Council Relations Policy, Rules of Order, and Code of Ethics (Bylaws) for the City Council and all boards, commissions, and committees of the City; and take appropriate action.]

MISS COOK, CONSIDER APPROVING RESOLUTION 2026-03-09-R02.

APPROVING A REVISED COUNCIL RELATIONS POLICY RULES OF ORDER AND CODE OF ETHICS BYLAWS FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AND ALL BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES OF THE CITY AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.

ALL RIGHT. BEFORE WE GET INTO DISCUSSION, I DO WANT TO ASK A QUESTION.

GRANT, MISS ALLISON BROUGHT UP A POINT, A GOOD POINT ABOUT THE THE BYLAWS AND THEN THE HOME RULE CHARTER POTENTIALLY CLASHING IN THE SENSE. DO WE HAVE A DRAFT FOR THE HRC DONE ALREADY? SO THE DRAFT THAT THE CHARGE FROM THE HRC AT THE LAST MEETING WAS TO HAVE THE THE DRAFT REPORT BY THE END OF END OF THE MONTH.

AND THEN THE HRC IS GOING TO HAVE A MEETING MID-APRIL AND THEN SEND IT TO COUNCIL.

SO NO, IT'S, IT'S NOT PREPARED JUST YET. YOU KNOW, YOU CAN LOOK AT THE AGENDAS FROM THE PAST COUPLE MEETINGS AND THERE'S SOME OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, BUT THOSE HAVEN'T BEEN FINALIZED BY THE COMMITTEE JUST YET.

BUT JUST JUST IF I MAY, TO ANSWER, ANSWER THAT QUESTION.

SO IN THE INSTANCE THAT, YOU KNOW, ONCE THE HRC COMMITTEE WRAPS UP THEIR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, IT GOES TO COUNCIL AND SOME OR ALL THOSE GO BEFORE THE VOTERS AND THEN THE VOTERS APPROVE THOSE.

ANY ANY INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE HRC AND THE BYLAWS WOULD BE ADDRESSED AT THAT POINT.

BECAUSE THE BYLAWS CAN'T CONFLICT WITH HRC. THE HRC TAKES PRECEDENCE.

SO YOU KNOW, THE BYLAW AMENDMENTS, IF THEY'RE APPROVED, THOSE TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

BUT ANYTHING THE HRC REQUIRES, YOU KNOW, VOTER APPROVAL.

SO AND THE BYLAWS CAN BE AMENDED MORE FREQUENTLY AND MORE FLUIDLY THAN OBVIOUSLY THE HRC.

SO THOSE WILL BE THAT'LL BE ADDRESSED AT A LATER DATE POTENTIALLY.

RIGHT. WELL, SOMETHING WE HAD ASKED AT THE AD HOC WAS TO HAVE A JOINT MEETING.

WE JUST NEVER GOT TO HAVE THAT JOINT MEETING WITH HOME RULE TO KIND OF GO OVER THOSE THINGS THAT CROSS BETWEEN THE TWO.

[00:50:03]

I KNOW WE SENT THINGS OVER, LIKE WHEN WE CAME UP WITH SOMETHING LIKE, SEND THIS OVER TO HOME RULE CHARTER FOR THEM, BUT WE'VE NEVER ACTUALLY HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET JOINTLY TO GO OVER ANY OF THOSE AREAS.

DO YOU THINK THE JOINT MEETING SHOULD BE SHOULD HAPPEN BEFORE WE MAKE A VOTE ON THE BYLAWS? JUST TO HAVE ANY CHANGES OR. THAT'S TOUGH BECAUSE A LOT OF THESE BYLAWS ARE IMPORTANT. THEY PUT A LOT OF THINGS IN PLACE FOR US.

FOR LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, INFORMATION REQUESTS, I HAVE A PLETHORA OF THEM THAT I'VE PUT IN OVER THE YEAR AND ALMOST HALF THAT I'VE BEEN HERE. AND WE'RE NOT HELD TO THAT TEN DAY THING LIKE A PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST FROM A RESIDENT.

SO STILL WAITING ON A LOT. SO THIS DOCUMENT KIND OF SHORES THAT UP AND PUTS IN PLACE SOME THINGS TO PROTECT IN THAT AREA.

YEAH, WE PUT WE'VE PUT QUITE A BIT OF WORK INTO THESE BYLAWS.

AND AS GRANT MENTIONED, I MEAN WE CAN ALWAYS COME BACK TO THEM IF WE NEED TO.

IF WE NEED TO LINE SOMETHING UP AS OPPOSED TO THE HOME RULE CHARTER THAT HAS TO GO TO VOTERS AND SO FORTH.

I'D ALSO LIKE TO BRING UP, YOU KNOW, WHAT MISS MCGUINNESS SAID ABOUT THE HOLDOVER OF SOMETHING THAT'S ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

WE ALWAYS HAVE THAT OPTION TO TABLING THAT ANYWAY.

SO SO THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF A TAKEN CARE OF. YEAH.

AND I WAS THINKING ABOUT THAT. AND I THINK THAT THERE'S SOME ITEMS THAT WE PULL.

LIKE WE DID SOME DAY WHERE WE JUST WANT TO THANK THEM.

AND, AND I WOULD HATE TO HAVE A CLAUSE IN THERE WHERE IF WE PULL AN ITEM THAT IT HAS TO GO TO THE NEXT MEETING.

SO I DON'T, I'M NOT. I THINK THAT THAT WOULD STILL, THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE KIND OF A DECISION ON COUNCIL IF IT'S SOMETHING WE WANT TO SAY, BUT WE WE'VE DONE THAT BEFORE WHERE WE TABLE ITEMS. SO BUT NOT EVERY ITEM NEEDS TO BE TABLED.

THERE'S ALSO THE SHOT CLOCK. THERE'S THINGS THAT IF WE DON'T MAKE A DECISION AT THAT MEETING, IT AUTOMATICALLY GOES INTO EFFECT OR WE ARE BREAKING THE LAW AND THEY CAN HOLD US ACCOUNTABLE FOR IT.

SO PUTTING SOMETHING LIKE THAT IN PLACE WOULD PUT A LOT OF UNDUE PRESSURE ONTO THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM FOR FASTER TURNAROUNDS WHEN THEY'RE ALREADY STRUGGLING AND UNDERSTAFFED.

AND WE DON'T REALLY WANT TO BE DOING THAT TO THEM EITHER.

BUT EVEN SAYING THAT IF SOMETHING'S PLACED, IF AN ITEM IS PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, ALL OF THE INFORMATION IS ALREADY GIVEN.

AND SO FOR US TO DISCUSS JUST IMMEDIATELY AFTER PULLING IT AS THE NEXT ITEM, AS MR. DEFFIBAUGH SAID, COUNCIL CAN TABLE, BUT AS MISS TODD ALSO BROUGHT UP, SOME OF THESE THINGS ARE TIME SENSITIVE AND SINCE ALL THE INFORMATION'S ALREADY GIVEN, THE AGENDA IS POSTED AT LEAST FIVE DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING, I THINK THAT'S ENOUGH TIME TO REVIEW THE DOCUMENTATION AND DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT WE CAN MAKE A VOTE, OR IF COUNCIL DETERMINES THAT WE WILL TABLE.

SO I THINK THAT'S SUFFICIENT. ALSO, IN THE BYLAWS ONE OF MY ADD INS IS THAT IF A COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS INFORMATION ON THE AGENDA, IT WILL AUTOMATICALLY GET SHARED OUT TO THE REST OF COUNCIL SO EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING AT ON THE AGENDA.

SO IF SOMETHING COMES UP ON THE CONSENT AND I DECIDE TO PULL SOME DOCUMENTS ON IT TO LOOK MORE INTO IT, EVERYBODY WILL GET THOSE SAME DOCUMENTS. SO YOU'LL GET LOTS OF EMAILS.

BUT I THINK THAT WILL BE VERY BENEFICIAL. SO WE ALL KIND OF SEE WHAT EACH ONE OF US IS LOOKING AT.

AND IF THERE'S A CONCERN IN SOME AREA AND THAT MIGHT ALSO HELP WITH THE CONSENT AGENDA, BECAUSE IF THOSE ARE ITEMS WE'RE PLANNING TO PULL, IT'S LIKELY THAT IT'S BECAUSE WE'VE LOOKED INTO SOMETHING AND THAT INFORMATION WILL BE SHARED OUT TO THE REST OF COUNCIL.

AND THEY SHOULD EACH OF US BE READING THOSE EMAILS AND STAYING UP TO DATE.

YEAH. AND I UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERN TOO. AND I THINK IT WAS RELATED TO THE RFP PROCESS.

AND I THINK THAT BECAUSE OF THAT ONE ITEM WENT AND ONLY HAD ONE, ONE DEAL ON IT.

SO I THINK THAT WE LEARNED FROM THAT. I THINK THAT WE CAN, WE CAN ASK STAFF AND GET A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAILS.

ABOUT THAT. GOTCHA. YEAH. GOTCHA. FOR FOR STAFF.

GOTCHA. GOTCHA. OKAY. BUT IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS.

AND IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO ASK ABOUT THE.

SO THE 8.1 BIANNUAL REVIEW OF THE CITY COUNCIL PROCEDURES.

JUST A CLARIFICATION. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS WILL BE SET FOR DISCUSSION AND DELIBERATION OF CHANGES PROPOSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL,

[00:55:09]

A COUNCIL APPOINTED COMMITTEE AND OR STAFF. SO THAT'S BASICALLY GIVING US A CHOICE OF THOSE THREE.

AND THEN I QUITE FRANKLY, DON'T THINK WE SHOULD HAVE A REQUIREMENT OF AT MINIMUM, TWO YEARS.

IT SEEMS LIKE A QUITE THE BURDEN TO REVIEW BYLAWS EVERY TWO YEARS BY LAW.

I THINK WE SHOULD MAYBE AT THE WILL OF COUNCIL, TAKE TAKE AWAY THE SHALL PART EVERY TWO YEARS OR AT MINIMUM, IT'S JUST SOMETHING I. I THINK WITH SOME OF THEM, WE FOUND THAT THERE ARE LAWS THAT COME UP THAT, THAT LIKE IMPACT HERE.

SO JUST KIND OF MAKING SURE IT'S CLEANED UP. BUT I DO I GET WHAT YOU'RE SAYING BECAUSE WE ALSO PUT IN HERE THAT STAFF CAN DO THOSE EDITS BECAUSE OF THOSE LAWS. SO IF IT COMES UP, THEY CAN GO IN AND MAKE THAT CORRECTION.

YEAH. WE'RE RELYING ON OUR ON OUR ATTORNEY AND STAFF TO KEEP TABS ON THE, THE LEGISLATIVE BODY AND THE CHANGES OF THE STATE OR COUNTY.

AND WE CAN MAKE THOSE CHANGES AS NEEDED. BUT HAVING HAVING IT WRITTEN IN HERE THAT AT MINIMUM ONCE EVERY TWO YEARS JUST SEEMS EXCESSIVE TO ME.

WOULD YOU BE OPEN TO CHANGING IT TO THE CITY COUNCIL MAY REVIEW INSTEAD OF WILL, CHANGE IT TO MAY.

ABSOLUTELY. BECAUSE THEN IT'S A CHOICE. IT'S NOT A REQUIREMENT.

NOW, CAN WE MAKE IT A REQUIREMENT THAT WHEN THE CHANGE DOES HAPPEN, THAT IT DOES COME TO COUNCIL? AND WHETHER IT'S NOT NOT TO JUST GET APPROVAL, BUT JUST TO MAKE US AWARE OF WHATEVER THE CHANGE IS.

SO WHEN THE BYLAWS, WHEN WE DO, WHEN STAFF DOES UPDATE IT BASED ON THE LEGISLATION CHANGES THAT WE ACTUALLY KNOW THAT IT'S BEEN JUST, JUST IN CASE SOMEBODY MISSED IT. YEAH. BEFORE WE GO, BEFORE WE MAKE THAT DETERMINATION, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR GRANT.

GRANT, WHAT IS THE AVERAGE REVIEW TIME FOR HOME RULE CHARTERS? IT'S JUST A VARY. IT VARIES ON THE CHARGE FROM COUNCIL.

SOMETIMES IF IT'S YOU KNOW, JUST TO LOOK AT 1 OR 2 SECTIONS, IT COULD BE A COUPLE OF MONTHS, BUT YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT, LOOK AT A COMPREHENSIVE LOOK AT THE HRC COMPREHENSIVELY, YOU KNOW IT JUST DEPENDS.

IT'S REALLY, IT'S HARD TO, TO GIVE A. DO YOU HAVE AN AVERAGE FOR TEXAS? MAYBE 3 TO 6 MONTHS, SOMETIMES LONGER. BUT LIKE I SAID, IT DEPENDS ON THE CHARGE FROM COUNCIL, I THINK. YEAH. AS, AS SOMEONE WHO SERVED ON THE HOME RULE CHARTER COMMITTEE, WHEN WE CAME UP WITH THAT NUMBER, THE NUMBER OF YEARS THAT AT A MINIMUM, I DID SOME REVIEW RESEARCH AND IT SHOWED AT LEAST 5 TO 10 YEARS.

AND SO I'M WONDERING IF MAYBE WHAT WE ARE ADDRESSING AND WHAT MIGHT NOT BE MORE APPROPRIATE HERE IS TO REVIEW THE BYLAWS THAT OFTEN AND MAYBE MOVE TO AT LEAST FIVE YEARS FOR THE HOME RULE CHARTER.

THAT IS LIKE THE CONSTITUTION. WE DON'T REVISIT AND CHANGE THE US CONSTITUTION.

YEAH, WE CAN, WE CAN, WE CAN. WE'RE NOT DISCUSSING HOME RULE CHARTER RIGHT NOW, BUT WE CAN DEFINITELY. THAT'LL BE A DECISION FOR THAT FOR THAT BOARD.

I THINK THEY'RE STILL MEETING. AND THAT'S LIKE HOW THE PEOPLE HAVE LIKE THEIR INPUT ON THE LAW AND ORDER WITHIN THE CITY.

SO DEFINITELY IT'S A DECISION FOR THE HOME RULE CHARTER.

I MISSED THE FIRST PART OF WHAT YOU SAID. SO HOME RULE CHARTER IS HOW THE PEOPLE GET TO HAVE A SAY IN THE LAW AND ORDER OF LIKE WHAT WE DO IN THE CITY.

SO I THINK IT NEEDS TO COME FROM THE BODY AS A WHOLE.

IF THEY WANT TO CHANGE FROM ONLY GETTING IT EVERY TWO YEARS TO EVERY FIVE YEARS, BECAUSE THAT'S A MUCH BIGGER WINDOW OF TIME BETWEEN WHEN THE PEOPLE CAN ACTUALLY HAVE A SAY IN, IN THEIR GOVERNMENT. YEAH. AND THEY CAN CALL AND IT DOESN'T EVEN IT DOESN'T SAY WE HAVE TO DO IT IN TWO YEARS.

THAT'S JUST, IT'S TWO YEARS BETWEEN ANY CHANGES THAT WE MAKE.

AND THAT'S AND THAT'S REQUIRED BY LAW. I BELIEVE CORRECT.

OR IS THAT IS THAT IS THAT DETERMINED BY THE CHARTER ITSELF.

SO SECTION 8.1 IS SOLELY A IT'S A LOCAL POLICY.

GOTCHA. OKAY. YEAH. I MEAN, YOU COULD IF YOU GUYS DIDN'T WANT TO PUT TO COUNCIL MEMBER LONG'S POINT, IF YOU DIDN'T WANT TO MAKE A REQUIREMENT ONCE EVERY TWO YEARS. YOU COULD JUST LEAVE IT, AS YOU KNOW, ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, RIGHT? YOU COULD LEAVE IT OPEN ENDED, WHICH I'VE SEEN DONE BEFORE. YEAH, CHARTER'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN THE BYLAWS.

THIS IS SOLELY A FUNCTION OF LOCAL POLICY FROM THE COUNCIL.

JUST JUST TO CLARIFY, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE BYLAWS.

AND IF A STATE LAW GETS ENACTED OVER THE SUMMER SESSION, AND IT FORCES US TO CHANGE THE BYLAW, WHAT IS THE PROCESS AT THAT MOMENT? YEAH. SO WE'LL GIVE A LEGISLATIVE UPDATE AND THEN AS SOON AS THE LAW TAKE EFFECT TAKES EFFECT OR BEFOREHAND,

[01:00:04]

WE'LL UPDATE THE BYLAWS. BUT I'LL SAY IT'S, I MEAN THERE WON'T BE A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE UPDATES THAT REQUIRE UPDATES TO THE BYLAWS.

IT'S PRETTY, PRETTY RARE. BUT IF THERE IS THAT INSTANCE, OBVIOUSLY THAT WOULD, THAT WOULD QUALIFY AS AN ADD NEEDED BASIS TO UPDATE THE UPDATE THE BYLAWS. DOES THAT TAKE A COUNCIL APPROVAL? YES, YES, YES IT DOES.

SO I THINK CHANGING THE WORD WILL TO MAY AND KEEPING THIS BECAUSE IT ALLOWS THAT STAFF ABILITY TO MAKE THOSE UPDATES WITHOUT HAVING TO PUT TOGETHER A COMMITTEE EVERY SINGLE TIME, BUT THEN ADDING THE PART THAT MAYOR ESCOBAR STATED THAT ANY CHANGES WILL BE BROUGHT BEFORE COUNCIL FOR FINAL REVIEW. JUST TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT STAFF CAN MAKE THOSE UPDATES, BUT ANY UPDATES MADE WILL ALWAYS COME BEFORE COUNCIL.

I AGREE WITH THAT. YEAH. AND STAFF JUST SO SO COUNCIL'S CLEAR STAFF CANNOT ADMINISTRATIVELY MAKE CHANGES.

THESE ARE YOUR BYLAWS. SO ANY CHANGES, WHETHER IT'S YOU KNOW MATERIAL OR NOT HAS TO COME FROM FORMAL COUNCIL ACTION.

BUT STAFF OR COUNCIL OR A COUNCIL APPOINTED COMMITTEE CAN MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS, BUT YOU GUYS HAVE TO FORMALLY APPROVE ANY, ANY AMENDMENTS TO THIS DOCUMENT. OKAY. SO YEAH, SO REGARDLESS, IT COMES TO US.

OKAY. SO I KNOW I WORKED ON THIS, BUT I HAVE SOME SUGGESTIONS TO IMPROVE IT A LITTLE BIT ON SECTION 7.7. 7.7(A) IT SAYS ENFORCEABLE BY THE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL.

I THINK THAT SHOULD BE CHANGED TO BE MORE LIKE THROUGH THE ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM SET FORTH IN THESE BYLAWS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CITY MANAGER AND PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN SECTION 9.4.

BECAUSE IF IT'S UP TO THE COUNCIL AND SAY YOU'RE THE UNDERDOG AND YOU'RE, YOU WOULD THEN BE REQUIRED TO HOPE THAT THE REST OF COUNCIL WILL SUPPORT YOU AND MAKING SURE YOU GET THE INFORMATION.

IF THERE'S A PROBLEM, THAT'S NOT REALLY GUARANTEED.

BUT IF WE PUT THAT GUARANTEE WITHIN THE DOCUMENT AND NOT WITHIN THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SITTING UP HERE, THAT GUARANTEES THAT NO MATTER WHO'S ELECTED AND OR WHEN, THIS IS THE ABILITY TO REQUEST INFORMATION IS PROTECTED. AND SO I THINK THAT'S ONE PART THAT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL.

AND THEN ADDING IN THAT THE REQUESTED INFORMATION UNDER THIS PROVISION SHALL BE FULFILLED WITHIN TEN BUSINESS DAYS OF RECEIPT.

SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A TIMELINE WHEN WE ASK FOR THINGS, I THINK A TIMELINE NEEDS TO BE PUT IN PLACE BEING EQUAL TO THAT OF WHAT THE RESIDENTS GET THE TEN DAYS. I THINK THAT'S FAIR. THE ONLY THING ABOUT THE TIMELINE, ESPECIALLY 10, THE 10 DAYS, IS THAT WE CAN REQUIRE WE CAN REQUEST INFORMATION THAT RESIDENTS CAN'T, AND SOME OF IT THEY HAVE TO CREATE.

SO I THINK A LOT OF THE ISSUE THAT WE HAVE WITH STAFF.

WE HAVE THAT ADDRESSED IN HERE. IF THERE'S A REASON WHY WE CAN'T GET IT OUR LAWYER GOES TO THE LAWYER, THE LAWYER ISSUES A RESPONSE. OR THEY JUST RESPOND BACK JUST LIKE IT WOULD TO A RESIDENT.

HEY, THIS IS GOING TO TAKE MORE TIME. SAME PROCEDURES THAT ARE ALREADY IN PLACE FOR RESIDENTS JUST CREATING A WAY TO HAVE A PAPER TRAIL.

SO SAY, YOU KNOW, AMBER DOES HAVE TO CREATE SOME FILE AND, OR SHE HAS TO HUNT DOWN A WHOLE BUNCH OF THINGS.

IT'S GOING TO TAKE MORE THAN TEN DAYS. SHE CAN JUST RESPOND AND SAY THAT AND THAT'S FINE.

JUST LIKE SHE WOULD TO A RESIDENT. OKAY. YEAH, I CAN AGREE.

I AGREE WITH THAT. AND THEN JUST PUTTING IN THAT, YOU KNOW, IF SOMETHING CAN'T BE FULFILLED, IT HAS TO BE IN WRITING WITH THE GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF FULFILLMENT DATE EXACTLY HOW IT IS FOR RESIDENT WHEN THEY MAKE A REQUEST.

AND THAT SHOULD JUST BE NOTED THAT IT'S FOR INFORMATION THAT'S READILY AVAILABLE.

IT'S TEN DAYS. IT'S NOT INFORMATION THEY HAVE TO REQUEST IT.

ALSO WE HAVE YEAH, WE HAVE IN HERE THERE'S SOME INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE TO, IT'S BEST IF WE COME IN PERSON FORWARD, AND IF THAT HAPPENS, THAT'S WHEN THE LAWYER WOULD KIND OF LIKE IF WE SEND IT TO THE AG BECAUSE IT WOULD BE, OUR LAWYER WOULD BE KIND OF LIKE THE AG FOR THOSE FOR THOSE SITUATIONS.

AND THEN WE IT, INSTEAD OF THE DOCUMENT BEING RELEASED DIRECTLY TO US, WE WOULD HAVE TO COME UP HERE IN PERSON TO LOOK AT THOSE SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS.

AND THAT'S FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. CORRECT? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THERE'S YOU HAVE ABOUT THREE CHANGES.

I MEAN, YOU CAN MAKE A MOTION AND SEE WHAT COUNCIL SAYS ABOUT IT.

BUT I KNOW THERE'S THE CHANGES FROM MAY TO, I MEAN FROM SHALL TO MAY FOR THE REQUIREMENT OF THE TWO YEARS.

AND THEN YOU SAID I THINK THREE CHANGES. SO I ALSO WANTED TO ADD THAT THE EXECUTIVE SESSION NOTES FROM ALL

[01:05:06]

BOARDS ARE ACCESSIBLE TO COUNCIL. SO IF WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT HAS HAPPENED INSIDE THE, CAN WE NOT KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING? NO, THAT'S COVERED UNDER THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT.

SO ONLY MEMBERS OF THAT BODY HAVE A RIGHT TO THE.

SO THEY CAN MAKE THEIR MAKING DECISIONS AND DOING ALL THESE THINGS.

AND WE'RE NOT. SO WE DON'T WE DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE CODE NAMES ARE WHEN THEY START PUTTING CODE NAMES ON THINGS.

THEY'LL EVENTUALLY COME TO COUNCIL, LIKE FOR INSTANCE, AS YOU SAW TONIGHT.

BUT YEAH, AS FAR AS THE CERTIFIED AGENDA AND WHAT'S, WHAT'S DISCUSSED BACK THERE ONLY THE MEMBERS OF THAT GOVERNING BODY HAVE A RIGHT TO BE BACK THERE UNDER, UNDER LAW. SO OUR, OUR BYLAWS CANNOT SUPERSEDE STATE LAW ON THAT MATTER.

UNDERSTANDABLE. OKAY. AND THE DOCUMENTATION IS, IS RESTRICTED FROM THE CERTIFIED AGENDA.

IS THAT IN STATE LAW AS WELL? YES. IF IT'S IF IT'S CONFIDENTIAL, IT IT DEPENDS ON WHAT'S BEING DISCUSSED.

WITH THE AMOUNT OF CHANGES BEING PROPOSED TONIGHT, I THINK IT MIGHT BE BEST FOR THIS TO BE UPDATED AND THIS BE TABLED TO THE NEXT MEETING WHERE WE'RE PROVIDED WITH AN UPDATED DRAFT FOR REVIEW, AND I'M.

GRANT. DID YOU DID YOU TAKE NOTES OF THE CHANGES? I MEAN, IT'S COUNCIL IN AGREEMENT TO FOR THE CHANGES TO BE MADE TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO US.

I AGREE. OKAY. YEAH, I AGREE. OKAY. I JUST HAVE ONE LAST ONE.

IT COMES TO THE AGENDA. I WOULD LIKE IT THAT IF WE ARE 3.1. SO IT SAYS ADDITIONAL ITEMS CAN BE PUT ON THE AGENDA BY THE MAYOR ON APPLICATION OF A COUNCIL MEMBER. I WOULD LIKE IT TO BE THAT IF IT IS SECONDED BY A COUNCIL MEMBER, THAT IT HAS TO GO ON TO AN AGENDA BECAUSE I'VE GOT SEVERAL THINGS I'VE ASKED TO PUT ONTO AGENDAS THAT ARE NOT HAPPENING.

SO I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE IN PLACE, THAT IF IT'S SECONDED BY ANOTHER COUNCIL MEMBER, IT CAN'T JUST BE BLOCKED OR FORGOTTEN, THAT IT DOES HAVE TO GO ON TO NO LATER THAN TWO AGENDAS FROM THAT DATE OR A SET DATE GIVEN. I THINK I WOULD LIKE IF WE'RE GOING TO DO IT LIKE THAT, A MAJORITY VOTE.

IT'S NOT JUST TWO. AND THAT'S JUST AVOIDS I WOULD SAY ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT WAS REQUESTED.

WE COULDN'T SHARE. SO IF WE GET INTO A POSITION TO WHERE NOW IT'S LAW AND TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS IS PUSHING TO GET THIS INFORMATION OUT THERE THAT WE CAN'T SHARE OR WE SHOULDN'T SHARE. I THINK THAT THAT PUTS THE CITY IN A POSITION.

NOW IF COUNCIL WANTS TO PUT THE CITY IN THE POSITION, THEN THAT'S, THAT'S COUNCIL CHOICE.

BUT I THINK THAT A MAJORITY VOTE ON AN ITEM, IF IT, IF IT DOESN'T COME UP SHOULD SUPERSEDE AND MAKE AND MAKE THAT HAPPEN.

BUT WE CAN'T VOTE ON IT IF YOU WON'T PUT IT, IF IT IT CAN'T BE PUT ON THE AGENDA.

SO FOR EXAMPLE, BACK IN DECEMBER, WE WERE TALKING ABOUT BUDGETS.

I ASKED TO PUT ONTO THE AGENDA MAKING IT PART TIME TO FULL TIME IN THE LIBRARY, WAS SUPPOSED TO COME BACK TO US TO, BY THE END OF JANUARY TO LOOK AT AND VOTE ON OR IN MARCH.

AND IT HASN'T EVEN BEEN DISCUSSED. YEAH, I THINK THAT. SO THINGS LIKE THAT.

I THINK WE START GETTING INTO CHARTER ISSUES.

WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO THAT, I DON'T THINK THAT WE CAN DICTATE THE HIRING AND FIRING OF ANY EMPLOYEES.

I'M NOT ASKING. WELL, IT WAS ALLOCATING FUNDS.

WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO ALLOCATE FUNDS TO THE BUDGET PROCESS.

AND SO WE CAN ALLOCATE THE FUNDS TO ALLOW THEM TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT.

THEY CAN'T UNLESS WE ALLOCATE THE FUNDS, AND THAT HAS TO COME BEFORE COUNCIL.

I THINK THAT SHOULD BE A STAFF OR CITY MANAGER'S REQUEST TO BRING IT TO COUNCIL, VERSUS US FORCING POSITIONS IN THE CITY.

IF WE NEED THE POSITION, I THINK JUST LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE WE ASKED FOR IT, IT DID COME UP.

I THINK THERE'S SOME POSITIONS THAT UNLESS STAFF IS ASKING FOR, WE SHOULDN'T DICTATE.

IT'S A BIG REQUEST BY THE PEOPLE. THAT'S WHY I BROUGHT IT UP.

BUT OKAY. WHEN WE PUT THIS INTO ANOTHER DRAFT, YOU HAVE A COLOR CODED RIGHT NOW.

CAN YOU THROW IN A THIRD COLOR JUST SO WE KNOW? YEAH. I WAS GOING TO SAY IF YOU COULD HIGHLIGHT.

I'LL FIND ANOTHER COLOR TO THROW IN THERE. YEP.

MOTION TO TABLE. YEAH. WE CAN. LET ME ASK A QUESTION REAL QUICK BEFORE WE.

I MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE ITEM K.3 2026-03-09-R02.

FOR MORE DRAFTING TO BE PUT TO IT, I GUESS YOU MIGHT SAY.

[01:10:07]

AND BROUGHT BACK IS AT THE EARLIEST CONVENIENCE.

OKAY. AND GRANT, JUST REAL QUICK, BEFORE WE HAVE A SECOND, YOU TOOK THE NOTES OF WHAT MISS TODD HAS SAID OR WE WILL? YES, I HAVE NOTES. AND AMBER, WE HAVE NOTES OVER HERE.

SO COLLECTIVELY WE CAN. YEAH, WE HAVE THE DIRECTION.

I JUST WANT TO ASK BEFORE. I GUESS WE ALREADY HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR, BUT WE DON'T HAVE A SECOND.

SO THE AD HOC COMMITTEE HAS A PRELIMINARY, IT HASN'T BEEN POSTED YET, BUT A MEETING ON THE NIGHT OF MARCH 19TH.

SO IS THE DIRECTION FROM THEY THEY STILL NEED TO MEET.

IF YOU RECALL, IN DECEMBER, WE ALSO STATED THAT AT OUR NEXT MEETING, WE BEGIN THE PROCESS OF CREATING.

SORRY, I MIGHT HAVE SAID HCRC AD HOC, HAS A MEETING.

YES. FOR MARCH 19TH. SO IS THE DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL TO HAVE THE THE AD HOC COMMITTEE REVIEW THESE PROPOSED CHANGES AND THEN BRING THEM BACK? OR DO YOU WANT TO JUST HAVE THEM COME STRAIGHT BACK TO COUNCIL? JUST I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I'D SAY THEY NEED TO GO BACK TO THE COMMITTEE.

SO I WOULD SAY I'M NOT SURE IF IT NEEDS TO GO BACK TO THE COMMITTEE BECAUSE THEN THE COMMITTEE CAN COME AND CHANGE WHAT WE JUST PUT ON THERE.

AND I THINK THAT WE'RE AT THE POINT RIGHT NOW WHERE THEY DID WHAT THEY WHAT THEIR JOB WAS AND WE HAVE OUR CHANGES TO WHAT THEY DID.

I'M NOT SURE SENDING IT BACK TO TO THE COMMITTEE FOR THEM TO AGREE ON THIS IS NECESSARY WHEN AT THE END OF THE DAY, IS COUNCIL IS KIND OF, IS UP TO COUNCIL. SO I THINK WE'RE JUST DOING A STEP TO THEN FIGHT ABOUT WHAT THEY CHANGE OR, YOU KNOW, OTHER STUFF. SO I THINK THAT'S GOING TO OPEN UP ANOTHER DOOR. BUT I KNOW YOU WERE SAYING THAT THERE'S ANOTHER REASON TO. YES, THERE IS IN IN DECEMBER, THERE WAS ANOTHER REASON THAT WE STATED THAT AD HOC NEEDED TO CONTINUE MEETING.

WHEN ASKED GRANT, YOU WOULD REPLY THAT IT IS SOMETHING THAT AD HOC WOULD DO AND SUGGESTED THAT IT'S A SECONDARY DOCUMENT TO THE BYLAWS, WHICH IS CREATING THE OUTLINE AND SKELETON PROCEDURES AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE HIRING OF A CITY MANAGER BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE SOMETHING IN PLACE.

AND SO AD HOC COMMITTEE DISCUSSED WANTING TO PUT SOMETHING IN PLACE AS A SKELETON.

OBVIOUSLY, COUNCIL WOULD ADD ON TO IT AS THEY FELT WHEN IT CAME TIME FOR THE ACTUAL PHYSICAL HIRING PART.

I KNOW WE'RE LOOKING AT POTENTIALLY PUTTING ON APPLICATIONS.

SO IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A SKELETON PROCEDURE IN PLACE, AD HOC NEEDS TO GET STARTED ON THAT.

AND WE'VE ALREADY DELAYED MULTIPLE TIMES BECAUSE THE BYLAWS KEPT GETTING PUSHED BACK.

SO. SO I GUESS THAT WOULD BE A VOTE FOR COUNCIL IF THEY WANTED TO GIVE THEM THAT DIRECTION.

BECAUSE I THINK WHAT WE VOTED ON WAS DIRECTION FOR JUST THE UPDATING THE BYLAWS.

SO I THINK COUNCIL WOULD HAVE TO GIVE THAT CREATE THAT COMMITTEE FOR THAT REASON. I THINK THAT THE AD HOC IS JUST A GENERIC NAME FOR WHAT THEY CAN DO.

YEAH. I THINK WE NEED TO GIVE SOME SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE TO THAT FOR THE CITY MANAGER, I THINK THE THAT WOULD NEED TO BE SOMETHING SEPARATE THAT THE COMMITTEE WOULD NEED TO MEET ABOUT AS OPPOSED TO PUTTING IT ALL WITH THIS.

YEAH, I AGREE. SO IF WE WANTED TO CREATE A COMMITTEE FOR THAT REASON, THEN WE CAN WE CAN BRING THAT UP ON AN AGENDA.

I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO CREATE A NEW. WE HAVE AN AD HOC.

WE DON'T NEED TO GO FIND THE PROCESS OF FINDING MORE RESIDENTS TO REDO THE WHOLE PROCESS.

THAT'S CRAZY WHEN WE ALREADY HAVE AN AD HOC IN PLACE TO JUST HAVE THEM GO THROUGH WITH IT.

AND THAT'S FINE. WE STILL, I THINK WE STILL NEED TO GIVE DIRECTION FROM FROM COUNCIL TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY IS IN AGREEMENT ON THAT, TO HAVE AN OFFICIAL VOTE. SO IT'D JUST BE WISE TO TABLE THIS UNTIL THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING AND HAVE GRANT MAKE THE CHANGES HIGHLIGHTED IN A DIFFERENT COLOR, OF COURSE. AND NEXT MEETING, WE CAN HAVE THE RECOMMENDATION THAT MISS TODD IS IS HAVING AS WELL.

SO I GUESS THE MEETING THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE COMING UP IS NO NEED TO SCHEDULE AT THIS TIME.

AND THEN AT THAT, I GUESS DEPENDING ON THE NEXT MEETING, WE'LL DETERMINE WHAT TO DO WITH THE COMMITTEE MOVING FORWARD.

SO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE TABLE. I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION.

BRYAN SECOND. ALL RIGHT, MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

AND AT THIS TIME, THIS WILL MOVE US TO K.4. CONSIDER APPROVING A REQUEST FOR ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THE FUTURE AGENDA AND NOT TO NOT FOR DISCUSSION OF THESE REQUESTS.

[K4. 2026-055 Consider approving a request for items to be placed on a future agenda and NOT for discussion of these requests.]

IS THERE ANY AGENDA ITEMS? YOUR HONOR, I HAVE A COUPLE ITEMS I'D LIKE TO SEE AND ONE IS CONCERNING THE ABBOT ADDITION.

THE ROADWAYS THERE. AND JUST IF IT'S ANY PLANS.

AND ALSO FM75, I BELIEVE THAT A PORTION OF IT NORTH OF MONTE CARLO MAY BE STATE, BUT THERE'S SO MUCH CONSTRUCTION GOING ON OUT THERE.

NOT TO DISCUSS, BUT BUT IT NEEDS WIDENED, BUT OTHER DEVELOPMENTS COMING IN.

[01:15:04]

THEY'RE MAKING EXTRA LANES IN THERE AND IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THAT.

I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S COORDINATED WITH TEXDOT OR WITH THE CITY AND AND I'D LIKE TO GIVE A LITTLE UPDATE ON.

YEAH. AND I THINK WE CAN DO THE RAILWAY ASSESSMENT UPDATE.

I THINK THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO, CAME TO US. YEAH.

SO WE CAN PUT THAT ON THE ON AN UPCOMING AGENDA TOO.

AND I THINK YOU HAD A FEW THINGS. SO. YES, I WOULD LIKE THE KIMLEY-HORN PRESENTATION FROM OCTOBER 2024 THAT WAS GIVEN TO PLANNING AND ZONING TO FINALLY BE BROUGHT BEFORE COUNCIL SO THAT COUNCIL CAN BE INFORMED OF THE MAJOR DRAINAGE CONCERNS THROUGHOUT THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE TO THE INFORMATION FROM OUR OWN ENGINEERS. ALL RIGHT.

IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE, THIS WILL TAKE US TO ITEM L.

[L. REPORT AGENDA]

MS. COOK. NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING IS MONDAY, MARCH 23RD, 2026 AT 6:30 P.M..

NEXT REGULAR EDC MEETING. TUESDAY, MARCH 17TH AT 6:00 PM.

NEXT REGULAR CDC MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18TH, 06:00 PM.

NEXT. AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING, THURSDAY, MARCH 19TH, 06:30 P.M..

NEXT HOME RULE CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING THURSDAY, APRIL 16TH, 6:30 P.M..

NEXT REGULAR P&Z MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 16TH AT 6:30 P.M..

NEXT LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD MEETING THURSDAY, APRIL 16TH, 6:30 P.M..

NEXT REGULAR PARKS AND REC ADVISORY BOARD MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 7TH AT 6:30 P.M..

SO THE AD HOC IS NOT WE'RE GOING TO NOT SCHEDULE THAT MEETING.

I BELIEVE. AND THEN AT THIS TIME, I ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.

I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION TO ADJOURN. I SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

WE HAVE A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY NAYS? TIME IS 7:47.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.